Phylogeography Patterns and Population Genetics Polymorphism of Daphnia cristata Sars and D. longiremis Sars (Anomopoda: Daphniidae) in North Eurasia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The first data on the population genetic structure of the D. cristata Sars, 1862 and D. longiremis Sars, 1862 species (Anomopoda: Daphniidae) from the water bodies of North Eurasia are present. The variability of the 12S gene fragment of the mtDNA for these taxa belonging to subgenus Daphnia (Daphnia) O.F. Müller, 1776 (Crustacea: Cladocera) in this region is studied, and the phylogenetic analysis performed. The genealogical relationships between haplotypes of the D. cristata and D. longiremis species and their geographical distribution are shown. Our new data allow us to suggest a recent rapid spatial expansion for D. cristata during the Late Pleistocene and Early-Middle Holocene periods. According to the results of the study, the distribution zones of D. cristata and D. longiremis species are separated in the latitudinal direction with the zone of their contact in Central Yakutia. Our results provide convincing evidence for the influence of ice ages and interglacial on the formation of modern genetic diversity and the phylogeographic structure of D. cristata and D. longiremis.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. I. Zuykova

Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Saint Petersburg Branch of the Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and oceanography

Author for correspondence.
Email: zuykova1064@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630091; Saint Petersburg, 199053

L. P. Sleptzova

Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: zuykova1064@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630091

L. V. Andreeva

Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone of the Siberian Branch f Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: zuykova1064@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Yakutsk, 677007; Novosibirsk, 630091

Ya. A. Kuchko

Institute of Biology of Karelian Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: zuykova1064@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk, 185910

N. A. Bochkarev

Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Saint Petersburg Branch of the Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and oceanography

Email: zuykova1064@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630091; Saint Petersburg, 199053

E. S. Zakharov

Ammosov North-East. Federal University

Email: zuykova1064@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Yakutsk 677000

References

  1. Котов А.А. Фаунистические комплексы Cladocera (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) Восточной Сибири и Дальнего Востока России // Зоол. журн. 2016. Т. 95. № 7. С. 748–768.
  2. Bekker E.I., Karabanov D.P., Galimov Ya.R., Kotov A.A. Barcoding reveals high cryptic diversity in the North Eurasian Moina species (Crustacea: Cladocera) // PLoS One. 2016. V. 11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161737
  3. Kotov A.A., Taylor D.J. Contrasting endemism in pond-dwelling cyclic parthenogens: The Daphnia curvirostris species group (Crustacea: Cladocera) // Scientific Reports. 2019. V. 9 (6812). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43281-9.
  4. Коровчинский Н.М., Котов А.А., Бойкова О.С., Смирнов Н.Н. Ветвистоусые ракообразные (Crustacea: Cladocera) Северной Евразии. М.: Тов-во науч. изданий КМК, 2021. 481 с.
  5. Zuykova E.I., Bochkarev N.A., Katokhin A.V. Identification of the Daphnia species (Crustacea: Cladocera) in the lakes of the Ob and Yenisei River basins: Morphological and molecular phylogenetic approaches // Hydrobiologia. 2013. V. 715. V. 135–150. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1423-3
  6. Zuykova E.I., Simonov E.P., Bochkarev N.A. et al. Contrasting phylogeographic patterns in closely related species of Daphnia longispina group (Crustacea: Cladocera) with focus on north-eastern Eurasia // PLoS One. 2018. V. 13(11). e0207347
  7. Zuykova E.I., Sleptzova L.P., Bochkarev N.A. et al. Mitochondrial lineage diversity and phylogeography of Daphnia (Daphnia) (Crustacea: Cladocera) in North-East Russia // Water. 2022. V. 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14121946
  8. Kotov A.A., Garibian P.G., Bekker E.I. et al. A new species group from the Daphnia curvirostris species complex (Cladocera: Anomopoda) from the eastern Palearctic: taxonomy, phylogeny and phylogeography // Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2021. V. 191. P. 772–822. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa046
  9. Гордеева Н.В., Дриц А.В., Флинт М.В. Генетическое разнообразие копеподы Limnocalanus macrurus арктических морей России // Океанология. 2019. Т. 59. № 6. С. 998–1007. doi: 10.31857/S0030-1574596998-1007
  10. Hebert P.D.N., Hann B.J. Patterns in the composition of arctic tundra pond microcrustacean communities // Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1986. V. 43. № 7. P. 1416–1425. doi: 10.1139/f86-175
  11. Samchyshyna L., Hansson L.A., Christoffersen K.S. Patterns in the distribution of Arctic freshwater zooplankton related to glaciation history // Polar Biol. 2008. V. 31. P. 1427–1435. doi: 10.1007/s00300-008-0482-4
  12. Зуйкова Е.И., Слепцова Л.П., Бочкарев Н.А. и др. Сравнительная филогеография викариантных видов группы Daphnia longispina s.l. (Crustacea: Cladocera) в Северной Евразии // Биология внутренних вод. 2024.
  13. Hall T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT // Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 1999. V. 41. P. 95−98. doi: 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-14998u1.29
  14. Katoh K., Rozewicki J., Yamada K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization // Brief. Bioinform. 2019. V. 20. № 4. P. 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108
  15. Guindon S., Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood // Syst. Biol. 2003. V. 52. P. 696–704. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235520
  16. Darriba D., Taboada G.L., Doallo R. et al. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing // Nature Meth. 2012. V. 9. № 772.
  17. Tamura K. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G + C-content biases // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1992. V. 9. P. 678–687. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040752
  18. Tavaré S. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Some mathematical questions in biology // DNA Sequence Analysis. Providence. Amer. Math. Soc. 1986. V. 17. P. 57–86.
  19. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987. V. 4. P. 6–25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
  20. Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016. V. 33. P. 1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054
  21. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models // Bioinformatics. 2003. V. 19. P. 1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
  22. Rambaut A., Drummond A.J., Xie D. et al. Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7 // Syst. Biol. 2018. V. 67. P. 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  23. Librado P., Rozas J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data // Bioinformatics. 2009. V. 25. P. 1451–1452. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187
  24. Bandelt H., Forster P., Röhl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999. V. 16. P. 37–48.
  25. Leigh J.W., Bryant D. PopART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction // Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015. V. 6. P. 1110–1116. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12410
  26. Grant W.A.S., Bowen B.W. Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marine fishes: Insights from sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation // J. Heredity. 1998. V. 89. P. 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/89.5.415
  27. Avise J.C. Phylogeography. The History and Formation of Species. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000. 447 p.
  28. Fu Y.X. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection // Genetics. 1997. V. 147. P. 915–925. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.915
  29. Tajima F. Statistical methods for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism // Genetics. 1989. V. 123. P. 585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585
  30. Стрелецкая Э.А. Список коловраток, ветвистоусых и веслоногих ракообразных водоемов бассейна рек Колыма и Анадырь // Гидробиологические исслед. внутр. водоемов Северо-Востока СССР. Владивосток: ДВНЦ АН СССР, 1975. С. 32–59.
  31. Кузьмина Л.И. Видовой состав зоопланктона рек арктической части Якутии // Экологическая, промышленная и энергетическая безопасность. Севастополь, 2018. С. 680–683.
  32. Фролова Л.А., Нигаматзянова Г.Р. Структурно-функциональная характеристика зоопланктонных сообществ термокарстовых озер о. Самойловский (дельта реки Лены, Республика Саха (Якутия)) // Уч. зап. Казанского ун-та. Сер.: Естественные науки. 2019. Т. 161. № 1. С. 158–171.
  33. Шевелева Н.Г., Мирабдуллаев И.М., Копырина Л.И. и др. Первые сведения о ракообразных (Crustacea: Cladocera, Copepoda) озер “Полюса холода” (Якутия): биология и экология // Акт. пробл. изучения ракообразных. Борок, 2022. 70 с.
  34. Зуйкова Е.И., Бочкарев Н.А., Котов А.А. Видовая и генетическая структура группы Daphnia longispina s.l. (Cladocera, Daphniidae) в водоемах Южной Сибири // Зоол. журн. 2020. Т. 99. № 10. С. 1110‒1123. doi: 10.31857/S0044513420100153
  35. Ishida S., Taylor D.J. Mature habitats associated with genetic divergence despite strong dispersal ability in an arthropod // BMC Evol. Biol. 2007. V. 7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-52
  36. Ishida S., Taylor D.J. Quaternary diversification in a sexual Holarctic zooplankter, Daphnia galeata // Mol. Ecol. 2007. V. 16. P. 569–582. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03160.x
  37. Costanzo K.S., Taylor D.J. Research article rapid ecological isolation and intermediate genetic divergence in lacustrine cyclic parthenogens // BMC Evol. Biol. 2010. V. 10. P. 166. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/166
  38. De Gelas K., De Meester L. Phylogeography of Daphnia magna in Europe // Mol. Ecol. 2005. V. 14. P. 753−764. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02434.x
  39. Thielsch A., Brede N., Petrusek A. et al. Contribution of cyclic parthenogenesis and colonization history to population structure in Daphnia // Mol. Ecol. 2009. V. 18. V. 1616–1628. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04130.x
  40. Hamrová E., Mergeay J., Petrusek A. Strong differences in the clonal variation of two Daphnia species from mountain lakes affected by overwintering strategy // BMC Evol. Biol. 2011. V. 11. № 231. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-231
  41. Zuykova E.I., Bochkarev N.A., Talor D.J., Kotov A.A. Unexpected endemism in the Daphnia longispina complex (Crustacea: Cladocera) in Southern Siberia // PLoS One. 2019. V. 14. e0221527.
  42. Garrigan D., Lewontin R., Wakeley J. Measuring the sensitivity of single-locus “neutrality tests” using a direct perturbation approach // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010. V. 27. P. 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp209
  43. Holsinger K.E. Lecture notes in population genetics. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. U-3043. Univ. Connecticut Storrs, 2015. doi: 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.100687
  44. Figuerola J., Green A.J., Michot T.C. Invertebrate eggs can fly: Evidence of Waterfowl-mediated gene flow in aquatic invertebrates // Am. Nat. 2005. V. 165. P. 274−280. https://doi.org/10.1086/427092
  45. Louette G., de Meester L. High dispersal capacity of cladoceran zooplankton in newly founded communities // Ecology. 2005. V. 86. P. 353–359.
  46. Van de Meutter F., Stoks R.,de Meester L. Size-selective dispersal of Daphnia resting eggs by backswimmers (Notonecta maculata) // Biology Letters. 2008. V. 4. P. 494–496. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0323
  47. Гросвальд М.Г., Котляков В.М. Великая приледниковая система стока Северной Азии и ее значение для межрегиональных корреляций // Четвертичный период. Палеография и литология. Кишинев: Штииница, 1989. С. 5–13.
  48. Биоразнообразие водных экосистем Забайкалья. Видовая структура гидробиоценозов озер и рек горных территорий / З.П. Оглы, О.К. Клишко, Н.А. Добрынина и др. Новосибирск: Изд-во СО РАН, 1998. 190 с.
  49. Еникеев Ф.И. Палеогеография Сартанского оледенения горного обрамления Муйской впадины (Северное Забайкалье) // Геосферные исследования. 2018. № 3. С. 58–70.
  50. April J., Hanner R.H., Dion-Coté A.-M., Bernatchez L. Glacial cycles as an allopatric speciation pump in north-eastern American freshwater fishes // Mol. Ecol. 2013. V. 22. P. 409–422. doi: 10.1111/mec.12116
  51. Hewitt G.M. Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 2004. B. V. 359. P. 183–195. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1388
  52. Chin T.A., Cristescu M.E. Speciation in Daphnia // Mol. Ecol. 2021. V. 30. № 6. P. 1398–1418. doi: 10.1111/mec.15824
  53. Hughes A.L.C., Gyllencreutz R., Lohne Ø.S. et al. The last Eurasian ice sheets − a chronological database and time-slice reconstruction, DATED-1 // Boreas. 2016. V. 45. P. 1–45. doi: 10.1111/bor.12142
  54. Mangerud J., Jakobsson M., Alexanderson H. et al. Ice-dammed lakes and rerouting of the drainage of northern Eurasia during the Last Glaciation // Quaternary Sci. Reviews. 2004. V. 23. P. 1313–1332. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.12.009
  55. Svendsen J.I., Alexanderson H., Astakhov V.I. et al. Late Quaternary ice sheet history of northern Eurasia // Quaternary Sci. Reviews. 2004. V. 23. P. 1229–1271. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.12.008
  56. Ильяшук Б.П., Ильяшук Е.А., Хаммарлунд Д. Изменения климата в предгорьях Хибин, Кольский полуостров, на протяжении голоцена // Бюл. Комиссии по изучению четвертичного периода. № 67. М.: ГЕОС, 2007. С. 85‒96.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Map of the distribution of D. cristata (blue squares) and D. longiremis (red squares) in Northern Eurasia. Places of joint or close habitat of the species are highlighted in purple. The numbers correspond to the sampling locations in the appendix to Table 1. GB1–GB4 are sampling points for samples from the GenBank (NCBI) database.

Download (1014KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Bayesian phylogenetic tree for D. cristata and D. longiremis based on the mtDNA 12S gene fragment (according to the identified haplotypes). The posterior probability and bootstrap support values ​​of the branching branches above 70% (BI/ML) are shown. The scale is the number of expected substitutions per site.

Download (338KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Рис. 3. Медианные сети (MJ) 12S гаплотипов D. cristata (а) и D. longiremis (б). Размер кружков соответствует относительной частоте гаплотипов (масштаб указан в нижнем правом углу); черные маленькие кружки – медианные векторы; вертикальные черточки – число мутаций, если оно не равно 1.

Download (545KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Supplement Table S1
Download (17KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences