Stabilizing Influence of Electron-Deficient Triazole Fragment on the Furan Heterocycle in Renewable Platform Chemicals

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The effect of an aromatic triazole ring conjugated with a furan heterocycle on the stability of furan under various reaction conditions was studied, and a significant reduction in the degree of degradation of the electron-rich furan core and hydrolysis of the ester group under the action of a model acid and base in various organic solvents was shown. The lowest degree of degradation and hydrolysis of the triazole-substituted 2-furoic acid ester was achieved in dioxane, as well as in polar aprotic solvents (DMSO and DMF). It was shown that under the same conditions, a significant tarring and hydrolysis of the furan ester, which does not contain a conjugated triazole fragment, occurs.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

D. Kolykhalov

Tula State University

Email: karbo@ioc.ac.ru
Ресей, 300012 Tula

A. Golysheva

Tula State University

Email: karbo@ioc.ac.ru
Ресей, 300012 Tula

B. Karlinskii

Tula State University; N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: karbo@ioc.ac.ru
Ресей, 300012 Tula; 119991 Moscow

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Halkos G.E., Gkampoura E.-C. // Energies. 2020. V. 13. № 11. P. 2906. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112906
  2. Seitkalieva M.M., Vavina A.V., Strukova E.N. // Dokl. Chem. 2023. V. 513. № 2. P. 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0012500823600967
  3. Redina E.A., Vikanova K.V., Tkachenko O.P., Kapustin G.I., Kustov L.M. // Dokl. Chem. 2022. V. 507. № 2. P. 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0012500822600158
  4. Zlotin S.G., Egorova K.S., Ananikov V.P., Akulov A.A., Varaksin M.V., Chupakhin O.N., Charushin V.N., Bryliakov K.P., Averin A.D., Beletskaya I.P., Dolengovski E.L., Budnikova Y.H., Sinyashin O.G., Gafurov Z.N., Kantyukov A.O., Yakhvarov D.G., Aksenov A.V., Elinson M.N., Nenajdenko V.G., Chibiryaev A.M., Nesterov N.S., Kozlova E.A., Martyanov O.N., Balova I.A., Sorokoumov V.N., Guk D.A., Beloglazkina E.K., Lemenovskii D.A., Chukicheva I.Y., Frolova L.L., Izmest’ev E.S., Dvornikova I.A., Popov A.V., Kutchin A.V., Borisova D.M., Kalinina A.A., Muzafarov A.M., Kuchurov I.V., Maximov A.L., Zolotukhina A.V. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2023. V. 92. № 12. RCR5104. https://doi.org/10.59761/rcr5104
  5. Bozell J.J., Petersen G.R. // Green Chem. 2010. V. 12. № 4. P. 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1039/b922014c
  6. Bielski R., Grynkiewicz G. // Green Chem. 2021. V. 23. № 19. P. 7458–7487. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1gc02402g
  7. Espro C., Paone E., Mauriello F., Gotti R., Uliassi E., Bolognesi M.L., Rodríguez-Padrón D., Luque R. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021. V. 50. № 20. P. 11191–11207. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cs00524c
  8. Gandini A., Lacerda T.M. // Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2022. V. 307. № 6. P. 2100902. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.202100902
  9. Karlinskii B.Ya., Ananikov V.P. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023. V. 52. № 2. P. 836–862. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cs00773h
  10. Jaswal A., Singh P.P., Mondal T. // Green Chem. 2022. V. 24. № 2. P. 510–551. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1gc03278j
  11. Najmidin K., Kerim A., Abdirishit P., Kalam H., Tawar T. // J. Mol. Model. 2013. V. 19. № 9. P. 3529–3535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-013-1877-x
  12. Kucherov F.A., Romashov L.V., Galkin K.I., Ananikov V.P. // ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018. V. 6. № 7. P. 8064–8092. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00971
  13. Rani M.A.A.B.A., Karim N.A., Kamarudin S.K. // Int. J. Energy Res. 2022. V. 46. № 13. P. 18996–19050. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.8545
  14. Averochkin G.M., Gordeev E.G., Skorobogatko M.K., Kucherov F.A., Ananikov V.P. // ChemSusChem 2021. V. 14. № 15. P. 3110–3123. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202100818
  15. Shepelenko K.E., Nikolaeva K.A., Gnatiuk I.G., Garanzha O.G., Alexandrov A.A., Minyaev M.E., Chernyshev V.M. // Mendeleev Commun. 2022. V. 32. № 4. P. 485–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2022.07.018
  16. Shepelenko K.E., Soliev S.B., Nikolaeva K.A., Minyaev M.E., Chernyshev V.M. // Russ. Chem. Bull. 2023. V. 72. № 8. P. 1746–1752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-023-3956-1
  17. John I.G., Radom L. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978. V. 100. № 13. P. 3981–3991. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00481a001
  18. Cao H., Rupar P.A. // Chem. Eur. J. 2017. V. 23. № 59. P. 14670–14675. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201703355
  19. Karlinskii B.Ya., Romashov L.V., Galkin K.I., Kislitsyn P.G., Ananikov V.P. // Synthesis. 2019. V. 51. № 05. P. 1235–1242. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1610414
  20. Savelyeva N.Yu., Shpirt A.M., Orlova A.V., Chizhov A.O., Kononov L.O. // Russ. Chem. Bull. 2022. V. 71. № 8. P. 1784–1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-022-3590-3
  21. Johansson G., Sundquist S., Nordvall G., Nilsson B.M., Brisander M., Nilvebrant L., Hacksell U. // J. Med. Chem. 1997. V. 40. № 23. P. 3804–3819. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm970346t
  22. Hashmi A., Enns E., Frost T., Schäfer S., Frey W., Rominger F. // Synthesis. 2008. V. 2008. № 20. P. 3360–3360. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1083144
  23. Cui X., Xu X., Wojtas L., Kim M.M., Zhang X.P. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012. V. 134. № 49. P. 19981–19984. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja309446n
  24. Fakhrutdinov A.N., Karlinskii B.Ya., Minyaev M.E., Ananikov V.P. // J. Org. Chem. 2021. V. 86. № 17. P. 11456–11463. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.1c00943
  25. Stini N.A., Gkizis P.L., Kokotos C.G. // Green Chem. 2022. V. 24. № 17. P. 6435–6449. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2gc02332f
  26. Warlin N., Garcia Gonzalez M.N., Mankar S., Valsange N.G., Sayed M., Pyo S.-H., Rehnberg N., Lundmark S., Hatti-Kaul R., Jannasch P., Zhang B. // Green Chem. 2019. V. 21. № 24. P. 6667–6684. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9gc03055g
  27. Hoang T.M.C., van Eck E.R.H., Bula W.P., Gardeniers J.G.E., Lefferts L., Seshan K. // Green Chem. 2015. V. 17. № 2. P. 959–972. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4gc01324g
  28. Tsilomelekis G., Orella M.J., Lin Z., Cheng Z., Zheng W., Nikolakis V., Vlachos D.G. // Green Chem. 2016. V. 18. № 7. P. 1983–1993. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5gc01938a
  29. Shen H., Shan H., Liu L. // ChemSusChem. 2020. V. 13. № 3. P. 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201902799
  30. Hu X., Kadarwati S., Wang S., Song Y., Hasan M.D.M., Li C.-Z. // Fuel Process. Technol. 2015. V. 137. P. 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.04.024
  31. Motornov V., Pohl R., Klepetářová B., Beier P. // Chem. Commun. 2023. V. 59. № 61. P. 9364–9367. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cc00987d
  32. Bauerová I., Ludwig M. // Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2000. V. 65. № 11. P. 1777–1790. https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc20001777
  33. Nummert V., Piirsalu M., Mäemets V., Koppel I. // Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2006. V. 71. № 1. P. 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc20060107
  34. Mangione M.I., Spanevello R.A., Anzardi M.B. // RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. № 75. P. 47681–47688. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra09558a
  35. Kozlov K.S., Romashov L.V., Ananikov V.P. // Green Chem. 2019. V. 21. № 12. P. 3464–3468. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9gc00840c
  36. Guan Y., Buivydas T., Lalisse R.F., Ali R., Hadad C.M., Mattson A.E. // Synthesis. 2022. V. 54. № 19. P. 4210–4219. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1811-8075

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Scheme of synthesis of triazolyl-substituted furan derivative of T-MPEK.

Жүктеу (128KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Photographs of reaction systems before heating (top) and after completion of the stability study experiment (bottom).

Жүктеу (249KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Morphology of the solid precipitate obtained during treatment of MEPC solution in acetonitrile with sulfuric acid.

Жүктеу (404KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. IR spectra of MEPC (1) and precipitates obtained after treatment of MEPC solution with 1 equiv. H2SO4 in acetonitrile (2) and 1 equiv. NaOH in 1,4-dioxane (3).

Жүктеу (151KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Morphology of precipitates obtained during treatment of T-MEPC solution in DMF with sulfuric acid (a) and MEPC solution in dioxane with sodium hydroxide (b).

Жүктеу (302KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 6. IR spectra of T-MEPC (1) and the precipitate obtained after treating the T-MEPC solution in DMF with sulfuric acid (2).

Жүктеу (102KB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 7. Graphic map of the stability of MEPC and T-MEPC under various reaction conditions. The color of the circle corresponds to the degree of conversion of the studied compound during hydrolysis or destruction under these reaction conditions.

Жүктеу (201KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024