Functional recovery of patients after shoulder joint replacement

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Currently, shoulder arthroplasty is being actively introduced into surgical practice, indications for operations are expanding, and the number of patients operated with severe injuries and diseases of the proximal humerus and shoulder joint is growing. The decrease in the effectiveness of restoring the painless functioning of shoulder, household independence and quality of life of patients after surgery may be due not only to the severity of damage to the shoulder’s joint structures of the before surgery, shortcomings in surgical techniques and the development of postoperative complications, but, possibly, the imperfection of medical rehabilitation programs for these patients.

To date, the content of the rehabilitation protocol for the early postoperative period has not been sufficiently substantiated, the need for strict immobilization of the operated joint, as well as the long-term benefits and effectiveness of early rehabilitation remains unclear.

The article attempts to summarize the available data on the physical rehabilitation of patients after shoulder joint replacement with various types of endoprostheses in the early and late postoperative periods.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Marina R. Makarova

Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine

Author for correspondence.
Email: makarovamr.mrm@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1787-7015
SPIN-code: 7640-4570

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher

Russian Federation, Moscow

Dmitry A. Somov

Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine

Email: docsomov@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3245-167X
SPIN-code: 9380-4174

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Research Associate

Russian Federation, Moscow

Egor A. Maiorov

Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine

Email: grgmaiorov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6754-5214
SPIN-code: 2357-8306

Graduate Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Fedorov SE, Zagorodny NV, Abakirov MD, et al. Primary reversible endoprosthetics for bilateral fractionation of the heads of the humerus bones. Bulletin Peoples' Friendship University Russia. 2018;22(2):165–170. (In Russ). doi: 10.22363/2313-0245-2018-22-2-165-170
  2. Maikov SV. Evolution of shoulder joint replacement. Bulletin Traumatology Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov. 2020;27(1):84–90. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/vto202027184-90
  3. Chirkov NN, Nikolaev NS, Kaminsky AV. Methods of prevention of unsatisfactory results and complications in endoprosthetics of the shoulder joint. Genius Orthopedics. 2019;25(3):312–317. (In Russ). doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2019-25-3- 312-317
  4. Gainullin RR. Epidemiological and clinical aspects of shoulder pain syndrome. Public Health Healthcare. 2014(2):53–57. (In Russ).
  5. Pavlov DV, Korolev SB, Aliyev RV. Results of shoulder joint replacement with anatomical and reversible systems. Modern Problems Science Education. 2017;(2):29. (In Russ).
  6. Zaraisky AS, Zorya VI. Endoprosthetics of the shoulder joint. Problems and solutions. Moscow Sur J. 2011;(4):58–64. (In Russ).
  7. Zagorodny NV, Nikolaev AV, Alekseeva OS, Bezverhiy SV. Evaluation of early results of reversible arthropathy arthropathy of the shoulder joint against the background of rotator cuff damage. Bulletin Postgraduate Medical Education. 2015;(1):36–40. (In Russ).
  8. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry [Internet]. Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty September 1999-December 2018. Annual Report 2019. Adelaide: AOA, 2019. 436 р. Available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/668596/Hip%2C+Knee+%26+Shoulder+Arthroplasty/c287d2a3-22df-a3bb-37a2-91e6c00bfcf0. Accessed: 15.05.2022.
  9. Lychagin AV, Kesyan A, Kalinskiy EB, Sukharev NA. Complications in the early postoperative period after reversible shoulder joint replacement. Bulletin Traumatology Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov. 2020;27(2):10–14. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/vto202027210-14
  10. Pavlov DV, Korolev SB, Aliev RV. Elongating plastic of the scapular muscle and its results in reversible arthroplasty of the shoulder joint. Genius Orthopedics. 2017;23(4):411-416. (In Russ). doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2017-23-4- 411-416
  11. Epifanov VA, Epifanov AV. Rehabilitation in traumatology and orthopedics: A guide. 3rd revised and updated. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2021. 560 p. (In Russ). doi: 10.33029/9704-6164-8-2021-RTO-1-560
  12. Federal clinical guidelines. Rehabilitation for periarticular pathology of the shoulder joint (2015). Bulletin of rehabilitation medicine. 2015;(3):73–78. (In Russ).
  13. Federal clinical guidelines. Rehabilitation during hip replacement in a specialized department of a hospital. Bulletin of rehabilitation medicine. 2016;(5):94–102. (In Russ).
  14. Prokhorenko VM, Slobodskoy AB, Chorny SN, et al. Primary endoprosthetics of the shoulder joint in severe traumatic injuries of the proximal humerus and their consequences. Bulletin of Eastern-Siberian scientific center. 2013;(5):80–86. (In Russ).
  15. Walton J, Spencer S, Walton M. Rehabilitation following shoulder arthroplasty. In: Trail IA, Funk L, Rangan A, Nixon M, eds. Textbook of shoulder surgery. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019.
  16. Kraus M, Krischak G, Tepohl L. Postoperative rehabilitation of patients with shoulder arthroplasty? A review on the standard of care. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;(5):441–449.
  17. Kotenko KV, Epifanov VA, Epifanov АV, Korchazhkina NB. Joint pain. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2018. 57 p. (In Russ).
  18. Epifanov VA, Epifanov AV, Kotenko KV, Korchazhkina NB. Diseases and injuries of the shoulder joint. 2nd ed, revised. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2021. 448 р. (In Russ).
  19. Khan MA, Razumov AN, Korchazhkina NB, Pogonchenkova IV. Physical and rehabilitation medicine in pediatrics. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2018. 404 p. (In Russ).
  20. Sekirin AB. Protocol of early rehabilitation after endoprosthetics of large joints (literature review). Bulletin Restorative Med. 2019;9(2):51–57. (In Russ).
  21. Slobodskoy B, Badak IS. Endoprosthetics of the shoulder joint. Genius Orthopedics. 2011;(4):71–76. (In Russ).
  22. Slobodskoy AB, Prokhorenko VM, Badak IS, et al. Endoprosthetics of upper limb joints. Bulletin Orthopedics Traumatology Prosthetics. 2011;(3):16–22. (In Russ).
  23. Dlyasin NG. The result of total endoprosthetics of the shoulder joint with a reversible DELTA XtendTM design. Traumatology Orthopedics Russia. 2011;17(4):105–107. (In Russ). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2011-4-105-107
  24. Radjabov МO, Aleksanyan МM, Kochemasov VM, Nikolsky IN. Primary endoprosthetics of the shoulder joint in severe injuries of the proximal humerus. Sklifosovsky J Emergency Med Care. 2017;6(2):154–157. (In Russ). doi: 10.23934/2223-9022-2017-6-2-154-157
  25. Kesyan GA, Urazgildeev RZ, Karapetyan GS, et al. Reversible shoulder joint replacement in complex clinical cases. Bulletin Smolensk State Med Academy. 2019;18(4):111–1207. (In Russ).
  26. Doany ME, Ling K, Jeong R, et al. Comparison of early range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty based on indication: A single center retrospective review. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2022;(6):24715492221108283. doi: 10.1177/24715492221108283
  27. Moffatt M, Whelan G, Gill P, et al. Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following total shoulder replacement: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36(2):190–203. doi: 10.1177/02692155211044137
  28. Denard PJ, Lädermann A. Immediate versus delayed passive range of motion following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;(25):1918–1924. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.032
  29. Hagen MS, Allahabadi S, Zhang AL, et al. A randomized single-blinded trial of early rehabilitation versus immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;(29):442–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.005
  30. Edwards PK, Ebert JR, Joss B, et al. A randomised trial comparing two rehabilitation approaches following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow. 2020;13(5):557–572. doi: 10.1177/1758573220937394

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2022 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 86508 от 11.12.2023. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80650 от 15.03.2021 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies