The effectiveness of general magnetic therapy and low-frequency electrostatic field: a randomized controlled trial
- Authors: Gerasimenko M.Y.1,2, Poddubnaya I.V.1, Evstigneeva I.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
- N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Issue: Vol 24, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 74-83
- Section: Original studies
- Published: 19.05.2025
- URL: https://rjpbr.com/1681-3456/article/view/642130
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/rjpbr642130
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/wzcoqg
- ID: 642130
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: At present, various physical therapy methods have been proposed for the rehabilitation of breast cancer patients. However, a key issue in oncological rehabilitation is that modern protocols often do not take into account functional impairments that arise during combined treatment. Yet minimizing the adverse effects and complications of radical therapy is essential for restoring the function of affected tissues, organs, and systems.
AIM: To clarify the mechanisms of action of general magnetotherapy and low-frequency electrostatic field therapy, and to justify their application starting on postoperative days 2–4 in breast cancer patients as part of two consecutive courses of medical rehabilitation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 78 female patients who underwent surgical treatment for confirmed stage IIB (T2N1M0; T3N0M0) or stage IIIA (T3N1M0; T1–2N2M0) breast cancer. The patients were divided into two groups (main and control) using simple randomization. The groups were comparable in terms of age and clinical and functional indicators, differing only in the prescription of physiotherapeutic methods during the two-stage course of medical rehabilitation.
RESULTS: It was established that two courses of medical rehabilitation in breast cancer patients, conducted in the early postoperative period (days 2–4) and again 1–1.5 months after surgery, contributed to the reduction of pain and postoperative edema, improvement in shoulder joint mobility, prevention of severe lymphedema, and enhancement of quality of life. These effects were confirmed by clinical and functional assessments, including laser Doppler flowmetry and electromyographic evaluation of shoulder muscles. Patients in the main group showed better restoration of shoulder joint mobility on the operated side.
CONCLUSION: General magnetotherapy exerts a normalizing effect on autonomic and psychoemotional status by selectively modulating hypothalamic excitability in cortical and subcortical brain structures. Low-frequency alternating electrostatic field therapy reduces the formation of protein-rich edema, normalizes neuromuscular excitability, promotes the restoration of tissue elasticity, improves functional tissue condition, and enhances local hemodynamics and microcirculation.
Full Text

About the authors
Marina Y. Gerasimenko
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: mgerasimenko@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1741-7246
SPIN-code: 7625-6452
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), professor
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowIrina V. Poddubnaya
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: poddybnayiv@rmapo.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0995-1801
SPIN-code: 1146-9889
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Аcademician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation, MoscowInna S. Evstigneeva
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Author for correspondence.
Email: evstigneevais@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9128-0965
SPIN-code: 5163-7726
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Petrova GV, editors. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2020 (incidence and mortality). Moscow: P.A. Herzen Medical Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology — branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “NMIRC”; 2021. 250 p. (In Russ.)
- Gui Y, Liu X, Chen X, et al. A Network Meta-Analysis of Surgical Treatment in Patients With Early Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(9):903–915. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz105
- Gerasimenko MYu. The results of and prospects for the further development of medical rehabilitation and medical rehabilitation. Russian journal of physiotherapy, balneology and rehabilitation. 2017;16(1):4–5. doi: 10.18821/1681-3456-2017-16-1-4-5UDK EDN: YHMDBH
- Zhukova LG, Andreeva YuYu, Zvalishina LA, et al. Breast cancer. Clinical guidelines. 2021. (In Russ.) Available from: https://oncology-association.ru/files/clinical-guidelines-2021/Rak_molochnoj_zhelezy.pdf
- Kizhaev EV, Borisov VI, Vavilov MP, Kizhaev YuE. Breast cancer: diagnostics, treatment, rehabilitation. Scientific monograph. Moscow: FGBOU DPO RMANPO MH RF; 2020. (In Russ.)
- Fares J, Kanojia D, Rashidi A, et al. Diagnostic Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Barriers and Innovations. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019;19(6):383–391. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.05.018
- Barco I, Chabrera C, García-Fernández A, et al. Role of axillary ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the preoperative triage of breast cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 2017;19(6):704–710. doi: 10.1007/s12094-016-1589-7 EDN: KDQSIJ
- Bevers BT, Niel LB, Baker LJ, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Breast cancer screening and diagnosis, Version 1.2023. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2023;21(9):900–909. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0046
- Dotan E, Walter CL, Broner IS, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Older adult oncology, Version 1.2021. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2021;19(9):1006–1019. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0043
- Coelho RC, Da Silva FML, Do Carmo IML, Bonaccorsi BV, Hahn SM, Faroni LD. Is there a role for salvage radiotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer refractory to neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Breast. 2017;31:192–196. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.026
- Wang GL, Tsikouras P, Zuo HQ, Huang MQ, Peng L, Bothou A, Zervoudis S, Tobias Teichmann A. Radioactive seed localization and wire guided localization in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J BUON. 2019;24(1):48–60.
Supplementary files
