The effectiveness of a new complex of physical rehabilitation with the inclusion of mechanotherapy technologies in improving quality of life in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Medical rehabilitation plays a key role in restoring functionality and social activity, as well as the physical and psychological aspects of quality of life (QOL) in patients with pathological fractures in the setting of osteoporosis (OP).

Objective: to assess the effect of a new complex of physical rehabilitation with the inclusion of mechanotherapy on the physical and psychological aspects of QOL in patients with vertebral fractures (VFs) and OP.

Methods. The study was carried out in the form of a prospective controlled open study in two parallel groups. 90 patients with osteoporotic VF were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to the intervention group (group 1, n=60), which received a new complex of physical therapy, or control group (group 2, n=30), which received only special complex of physical exercises. QOL and pain level assessment was performed at baseline and at follow-up on the 21st and 70th day in patients of both groups. A special questionnaire QUALEFFO-41 was used to assess QOL.

Results. Administration of a new physical rehabilitation complex resulted in pain reduction and improvement of such QOL aspects as jobs around the house, mobility and mental state. No dynamics was found in QUALEFFO-41 scale in “daily living activity” and “leisure, social activities”, “general health perception” domains. Therapy effect on pain syndrome relief, expansion of daily living activity, mobility and increasement in overall QOL assessment, remains for at least 4 weeks after the rehabilitation course.

Conclusion. New three-week physical therapy complex, including mechanotherapeutic methods with biological feedback and special physical exercises in the gym and pool can be recommended for the rehabilitation of patients with osteoporotic VF in order to increase QOL and reduce back pain.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Larisa A. Marchenkova

National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology

Author for correspondence.
Email: marchenkovala@nmicrk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1886-124X
SPIN-code: 9619-8004

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Ekaterina V. Makarova

National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology

Email: rue-royal@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3767-8475
SPIN-code: 1305-6152

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Marina Yu. Gerasimenko

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: mgerasimenko@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1741-7246
SPIN-code: 7625-6452

MD, PhD, Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Valeria A. Vasilieva

National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology

Email: valeri08.00@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6526-4512
SPIN-code: 7911-0401

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Mikhail A. Eryomushkin

National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology

Email: medmassage@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3452-8706
SPIN-code: 5602-6899

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Elena M. Styazkina

National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology

Email: styazelena@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4612-5119
SPIN-code: 3171-6314

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Inna S. Evstigneeva

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: evstigneevais@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9128-0965
SPIN-code: 5163-7726

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16 Suppl 2:S3–S7. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1702-6.
  2. Madureira M, Ciconelli R, Pereira R. Quality of life measurements in patients with osteoporosis and fractures. Clinics. 2012;67(11):1315–1320. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(11)16.
  3. Lesnyak OM, Benevolenskaya LI. Osteoporosis in the Russian Federation: Problems and Perspectives. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya. 2010;(5):14–18. (In Russ). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484- 2010-725.
  4. Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY; Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF). European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women [published correction appears in Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(1):209] [published correction appears in Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(4):801]. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30(1):3–44. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5.
  5. Bączyk G, Samborski W, Jaracz K. Evaluation of the quality of life of postmenopausal osteoporotic and osteopenic women with or without fractures. Arch Med Sci. 2016;12(4):819–827. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.55012.
  6. Carr A, Higginson I, Robinson PG. Quality of Life. Vol. 13. BMJ Books; 2003. 139 p.
  7. Anderson KL, Burckhardt CS. Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life as an outcome variable for health care intervention and research. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29:298–306. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00889.x.
  8. Watts NB. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®): applications in clinical practice. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011;20(4):525–531. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2294.
  9. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al. Quality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis: the development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(1):36–38.
  10. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al. Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the quality of life questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(2):150–160.
  11. Shah VR, Christian DS, Prajapati AC, et al. Quality of life among elderly population residing in urban field practice area of a tertiary care institute of Ahmedabad city, Gujarat. J Family Med Prim Care. 2017;6(1):101–105. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.214965.
  12. Marchenkova LA, Prokhorova EA, Dreval’ AV, et al. The influence of postmenopausal osteoporosis and subclinical vertebral fractures on postmenopausal women’s quality of life. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2014;(32):43–49. (In Russ). doi: 10.18786/2072-0505-2014-32-43-49.
  13. Jahelka B, Dorner T, Terkula R, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis with and without fractures in a geriatric rehabilitation department. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2009;159(9-10):235–240. doi: 10.1007/s10354-009-0655-y.
  14. Wilson S, Sharp CA, Davie MW. Health-related quality of life in patients with osteoporosis in the absence of vertebral fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(12):2749–2768. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2050-6.
  15. Alekna V, Tamulaitiene M, Būtenaite V. The impact of subclinical vertebral fractures on health-related quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2006;42(9):744–750.
  16. Romagnoli E, Carnevale V, Nofroni I, et al. Quality of life in ambulatory postmenopausal women: the impact of reduced bone mineral density and subclinical vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(12):975–980. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1633-2.
  17. Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, et al. Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(7):1384–1392. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.7.1384.
  18. Haczynski J, Jakimiuk A. Vertebral fractures: a hidden problem of osteoporosis. Med Sci Monitor. 2001;7(5):1108–1117.
  19. Marchenkova LA, Makarova EV, Eremushkin MA, et al. Muscular and strength deficiency in patients with osteoporotic compression vertebral fractures: osteoporosis as a risk factor for sarcopenia. Kurskii nauchno-prakticheskii vestnik "Chelovek i ego zdorov'e". 2019;(2):27–38. (In Russ).
  20. Makarova EV, Marchenkova LA, Eremushkin MA, et al. Coordination disorders in patients with osteoporotic compression vertebral fractures. Bulletin of rehabilitation medicine. 2019;(2):13–20. (In Russ).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2020 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 86508 от 11.12.2023
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80650 от 15.03.2021
г.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies