Редакционная политика

Тематика журнала

Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy publishes high quality frontier reviews, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited issues on all aspects of basic research on stem cells and their uses in clinical therapy. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in stem cells research. The scope of the journal covers the following topics including, but not limited to:

  • Cancer Stem Cells
  • Embryonic Stem Cells
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Tissue-Specific Stem Cells
  • Stem Cell Technology: Epigenetics, Genomics, Proteomics, and Metabonomics

 

Разделы и направления

Medicine

 

Рецензирование

Bentham Science Publishers follows the double-blind peer review procedure for submissions of all manuscripts to its journals.

All submitted articles are subjected to an extensive peer review in consultation with members of the journal’s editorial board and independent external referees (usually three reviewers). All manuscripts/chapters are assessed rapidly and the decision based on all the peer reviewers' comments, taken by the journal’s Editor-in-Chief, is then conveyed to the author(s).

Submissions from the Editor-in-Chief/Co-Editor/Editorial Board Members will undergo independent peer review and will be submitted to another Editor for his decision on acceptance. For further details, please visit complete guidelines at: https://benthamscience.com/pages/peer-reviews

Use of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies in the Peer Review Process

Since the use of AI technology has increased, it has brought its own challenges regarding the originality of the review of submitted manuscripts. Bentham Science has been striving to improve its policies accordingly. With time, we will continue to update our policies to support our reviewers, authors, and editors.

The quality of the peer review of submitted articles has been our top priority. The reviewers are advised not to use AI technologies or any other related assisting resources to generate review reports that could compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the reports.

The full Reviewer Guidelines are available here: https://www.benthamscience.com/journal/60/guideline-for-reviewers