Email this article The evolution of the legal practice of collecting the cost of goods, works, services in the absence of a state (municipal) contract
- Authors: Trofimov A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- St. Petersburg State University
- Issue: No 5 (2024)
- Pages: 42-51
- Section: Court, prosecutor’s office, bar, notarial system
- URL: https://rjpbr.com/1026-9452/article/view/648939
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945224050046
- ID: 648939
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The article is a study of judicial practice on the issue of recovery of unjustified enrichment by private entities (suppliers, contractors, performers) from state (municipal) customers in the absence of a concluded state (municipal) contract provided for by the legislation on the contract system.
Full Text
About the authors
Albert A. Trofimov
St. Petersburg State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: albert.trofimov@gmail.com
PhD in Law, Assistant of the Department of Administrative and Financial Law, Faculty of Law
Russian Federation, St. PetersburgReferences
- Kikavets V. V. The legal form of financial support for public procurement // State and Law. 2022. No. 3. Pp. 89–98 (in Russ.).
- Kovalkova E. Yu. On the issue of recovery of the cost of goods delivered, works performed, services rendered in the absence of a state (municipal) contract // Scientific notes of the Kazan branch of the Russian State Unitary Enterprise. 2017. Vol. 13. Pp. 192–203 (in Russ.).
Supplementary files
