Structure-based Virtual Screening, Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, and Metabolic Reactivity Studies of Quinazoline Derivatives for their Anti-EGFR Activity Against Tumor Angiogenesis


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Background:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER-1) and its role in tumor development and progression through the mechanism of tumor angiogenesis is prevalent in non-small lung cancer, head and neck cancer, cholangiocarcinoma & glioblastoma. Previous treatments targeting the oncogenic activity of EGFR's kinase domain have been hindered by acquired mutational resistance and side effects from existing drugs like erlotinib, highlighting the need for new EGFR inhibitors through structure- based drug designing.

Objective:The research aims to develop novel quinazoline derivatives through structure-based virtual screening, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation to potentially interact with EGFR's kinase domain and impede tumor angiogenic phenomenon.

Methods:Quinazoline derivatives were retrieved and filtered from the PubChem database using structure- based virtual screening and the Lipinski rule of five drug-likeness studies. Molecular docking-based virtual screening methods and molecular dynamics simulation were then carried out to identify top leads.

Results:A total of 1000 quinazoline derivatives were retrieved, with 671 compounds possessing druglike properties after applying Lipinski filters. Further filtration using ADME and toxicity filters yielded 28 compounds with good pharmacokinetic profiles. Docking-based virtual screening identified seven compounds with better binding scores than the control drug, dacomitinib. After cross-checking binding scores, three top compounds QU524, QU571, and QU297 were selected for molecular dynamics simulation study of 100 ns interval using Desmond module of Schrodinger maestro to understand their conformational stability.

Conclusion:The research results showed that the selected quinazoline leads exhibited better binding affinity and conformational stability than the control drug, erlotinib. These compounds also had good pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and did not violate Lipinski’s rule of five limits. The findings suggest that these leads have the potential to target EGFR's kinase domain and inhibit the EGFR-associated phenomenon of tumor angiogenesis.

Авторлар туралы

Altaf Shah

Department of Biosciences, Integral University

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Shaban Ahmad

Department of Computer Science, Jamia Millia Islamia

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Manoj Yadav

Department of Bioinformatics, SRM University

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Khalid Raza

Department of Computer Science, Jamia Millia Islamia

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Mohammad Kamal

Institutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital,, Sichuan University,

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Salman Akhtar

, Novel Global Community Educational Foundation

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: info@benthamscience.net

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Ellis, L.M. Epidermal growth factor receptor in tumor angiogenesis. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am., 2004, 18(5), 1007-1021, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2004.06.002 PMID: 15474332
  2. Salomon, D.S.; Brandt, R.; Ciardiello, F.; Normanno, N. Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 1995, 19(3), 183-232. doi: 10.1016/1040-8428(94)00144-I PMID: 7612182
  3. Shah, A.A.; Kamal, M.A.; Akhtar, S. Tumor angiogenesis and VEGFR-2: Mechanism, pathways and current biological therapeutic interventions. Curr. Drug Metab., 2021, 22(1), 50-59. doi: 10.2174/18755453MTEwxNzQ0x PMID: 33076807
  4. Minder, P.; Zajac, E.; Quigley, J.P.; Deryugina, E.I. EGFR regulates the development and microarchitecture of intratumoral angiogenic vasculature capable of sustaining cancer cell intravasation. Neoplasia, 2015, 17(8), 634-649. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2015.08.002 PMID: 26408256
  5. Sasaki, T.; Hiroki, K.; Yamashita, Y. The role of epidermal growth factor receptor in cancer metastasis and microenvironment. Bio. Med. Res. Int., 2013, 2013, 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2013/546318 PMID: 23986907
  6. De Jong, K.P.; Stellema, R.; Karrenbeld, A.; Koudstaal, J.; Gouw, A.S.; Sluiter, W.J.; Peeters, P.M.J.G.; Slooff, M.J.H.; De Vries, E.G.E. Clinical relevance of transforming growth factor? epidermal growth factor receptor, p53, and Ki67 in colorectal liver metastases and corresponding primary tumors. Hepatology, 1998, 28(4), 971-979. doi: 10.1002/hep.510280411 PMID: 9755233
  7. Mendelsohn, J. The epidermal growth factor receptor as a target for cancer therapy. Endocr. Relat. Cancer, 2001, 8(1), 3-9. doi: 10.1677/erc.0.0080003 PMID: 11350723
  8. Herbst, R.S. Review of epidermal growth factor receptor biology. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2004, 59(2)(Suppl.), S21-S26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.11.041 PMID: 15142631
  9. Harris, A.L. Hypoxia - a key regulatory factor in tumour growth. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2002, 2(1), 38-47. doi: 10.1038/nrc704 PMID: 11902584
  10. Suhardja, A.; Hoffman, H. Role of growth factors and their receptors in proliferation of microvascular endothelial cells. Microsc. Res. Tech., 2003, 60(1), 70-75. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10245 PMID: 12500263
  11. Ellis, L.; Liu, W.; Ahmad, S.A.; Fan, F.; Jung, Y.D.; Shaheen, R.M.; Reinmuth, N. Overview of angiogenesis: Biologic implications for antiangiogenic therapy. Semin. Oncol., 2001, 28(5)(Suppl. 16), 94-104. doi: 10.1016/S0093-7754(01)90287-8 PMID: 11706401
  12. Fidler, I.J.; Yano, S.; Zhang, R.; Fujimaki, T.; Bucana, C.D. The seed and soil hypothesis: vascularisation and brain metastases. Lancet Oncol., 2002, 3(1), 53-57. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(01)00622-2 PMID: 11905606
  13. Iqbal, S.; Lenz, H.J. Integration of novel agents in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 2004, 54(Suppl. 1), S32-S39. doi: 10.1007/s00280-004-0884-0 PMID: 15309512
  14. Langley, R.R.; Fan, D.; Tsan, R.Z.; Rebhun, R.; He, J.; Kim, S.J.; Fidler, I.J. Activation of the platelet-derived growth factor-receptor enhances survival of murine bone endothelial cells. Cancer Res., 2004, 64(11), 3727-3730. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3863 PMID: 15172974
  15. Kim, S.J.; Uehara, H.; Karashima, T.; Shepherd, D.L.; Killion, J.J.; Fidler, I.J. Blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in tumor cells and tumor-associated endothelial cells for therapy of androgen-independent human prostate cancer growing in the bone of nude mice. Clin. Cancer Res., 2003, 9(3), 1200-1210. PMID: 12631626
  16. Sasaki, T.; Nakamura, T.; Rebhun, R.B.; Cheng, H.; Hale, K.S.; Tsan, R.Z.; Fidler, I.J.; Langley, R.R. Modification of the primary tumor microenvironment by transforming growth factor alpha-epidermal growth factor receptor signaling promotes metastasis in an orthotopic colon cancer model. Am. J. Pathol., 2008, 173(1), 205-216. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.071147 PMID: 18583324
  17. Liu, T.C.; Jin, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, K. Role of epidermal growth factor receptor in lung cancer and targeted therapies. Am. J. Cancer Res., 2017, 7(2), 187-202. PMID: 28337370
  18. Larsen, A.K.; Ouaret, D.; El Ouadrani, K.; Petitprez, A. Targeting EGFR and VEGF(R) pathway cross-talk in tumor survival and angiogenesis. Pharmacol. Ther., 2011, 131(1), 80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.03.012 PMID: 21439312
  19. Niu, G.; Wright, K.L.; Huang, M.; Song, L.; Haura, E.; Turkson, J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, T.; Sinibaldi, D.; Coppola, D.; Heller, R.; Ellis, L.M.; Karras, J.; Bromberg, J.; Pardoll, D.; Jove, R.; Yu, H. Constitutive Stat3 activity up-regulates VEGF expression and tumor angiogenesis. Oncogene, 2002, 21(13), 2000-2008. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205260 PMID: 11960372
  20. Forsythe, J.A.; Jiang, B.H.; Iyer, N.V.; Agani, F.; Leung, S.W.; Koos, R.D.; Semenza, G.L. Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Mol. Cell. Biol., 1996, 16(9), 4604-4613. doi: 10.1128/MCB.16.9.4604 PMID: 8756616
  21. Corrado, C.; Fontana, S. Hypoxia and HIF signaling: One axis with divergent effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2020, 21(16), 5611. doi: 10.3390/ijms21165611 PMID: 32764403
  22. Del Re, M.; Crucitta, S.; Gianfilippo, G.; Passaro, A.; Petrini, I.; Restante, G.; Michelucci, A.; Fogli, S.; de Marinis, F.; Porta, C.; Chella, A.; Danesi, R. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance in EGFR-positive NSCLC: From tissue to liquid biopsy to guide treatment strategy. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2019, 20(16), 3951. doi: 10.3390/ijms20163951 PMID: 31416192
  23. Harvey, R.D.; Adams, V.R.; Beardslee, T.; Medina, P. Afatinib for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract., 2020, 26(6), 1461-1474. doi: 10.1177/1078155220931926 PMID: 32567494
  24. Pan, P.C.; Magge, R.S. Mechanisms of EGFR resistance in glioblastoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2020, 21(22), 8471. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228471 PMID: 33187135
  25. Fu, K.; Xie, F.; Wang, F.; Fu, L. Therapeutic strategies for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients with osimertinib resistance. J. Hematol. Oncol., 2022, 15(1), 173. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01391-4 PMID: 36482474
  26. Yun, C.H.; Mengwasser, K.E.; Toms, A.V.; Woo, M.S.; Greulich, H.; Wong, K.K.; Meyerson, M.; Eck, M.J. The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2008, 105(6), 2070-2075. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709662105 PMID: 18227510
  27. Hossam, M.; Lasheen, D.S.; Abouzid, K.A.M. Covalent EGFR inhibitors: Binding mechanisms, synthetic approaches, and clinical profiles. Arch. Pharm., 2016, 349(8), 573-593. doi: 10.1002/ardp.201600063 PMID: 27258393
  28. Arrieta, O.; Vega-González, M.T.; López-Macías, D.; Martínez-Hernández, J.N.; Bacon-Fonseca, L.; Macedo-Pérez, E.O.; Ramírez-Tirado, L.A.; Flores-Estrada, D.; de la Garza-Salazar, J. Randomized, open-label trial evaluating the preventive effect of tetracycline on afatinib induced-skin toxicities in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer, 2015, 88(3), 282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.03.019 PMID: 25882778
  29. Piotrowska, Z.; Isozaki, H.; Lennerz, J.K.; Gainor, J.F.; Lennes, I.T.; Zhu, V.W.; Marcoux, N.; Banwait, M.K.; Digumarthy, S.R.; Su, W.; Yoda, S.; Riley, A.K.; Nangia, V.; Lin, J.J.; Nagy, R.J.; Lanman, R.B.; Dias-Santagata, D.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; Iafrate, A.J.; Heist, R.S.; Shaw, A.T.; Evans, E.K.; Clifford, C.; Ou, S.I.; Wolf, B.; Hata, A.N.; Sequist, L.V. Landscape of acquired resistance to osimertinib in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC and clinical validation of combined EGFR and RET inhibition with osimertinib and BLU-667 for acquired RET fusion. Cancer Discov., 2018, 8(12), 1529-1539. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1022 PMID: 30257958
  30. Wang, S.; Song, Y.; Liu, D. EAI045: The fourth-generation EGFR inhibitor overcoming T790M and C797S resistance. Cancer Lett., 2017, 385, 51-54. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.11.008 PMID: 27840244
  31. Grabe, T.; Lategahn, J.; Rauh, D. C797S resistance: The undruggable EGFR mutation in non-small cell lung cancer? ACS Med. Chem. Lett., 2018, 9(8), 779-782. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00314 PMID: 30128066
  32. Bowers, K.J. Scalable algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations on commodity clusters. SC ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, Tampa, FL, USA, 2006. doi: 10.1109/SC.2006.54
  33. Bharadwaj, S.; El-Kafrawy, S.A.; Alandijany, T.A.; Bajrai, L.H.; Shah, A.A.; Dubey, A.; Sahoo, A.K.; Yadava, U.; Kamal, M.A.; Azhar, E.I.; Kang, S.G.; Dwivedi, V.D. Structure-based identification of natural products as SARS-CoV-2 Mpro antagonist from Echinacea angustifolia using computational approaches. Viruses, 2021, 13(2), 305. doi: 10.3390/v13020305 PMID: 33672054

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Bentham Science Publishers, 2024