Standardization of criteria for interpreting the results of mutagenicity assessment in the Ames test
- Authors: Egorova O.V.1, Ilyushina N.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Budgetary Institution of Science “Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman” of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
- Issue: No 5 (2024)
- Pages: 313-321
- Section: Research methods
- Published: 15.12.2024
- URL: https://rjpbr.com/0869-7922/article/view/646163
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2024-32-5-313-321
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ghmjlq
- ID: 646163
Cite item
Abstract
Introduction. Currently, various combinations of criteria for interpreting the results are used to make a conclusion about the mutagenic activity in the Ames test. In some cases where weak effects are present, especially when evaluating the mutagenicity of generic pesticides that may contain mutagenic impurities, different conclusions are possible, depending on the criteria chosen.
Material and methods. To standardize the criteria for interpreting the results in the Ames test, data obtained earlier in the assessment of the mutagenic activity of technical pesticide products were used. The studies were carried out in accordance with the OECD Standard Protocol No. 471 and State Standard (Russian: ГОСТ) 32376–2013 by direct application to the plate and under pre-incubation conditions.
Results. The applicability of three combinations of criteria for interpretation of Ames test results was evaluated using our own previously obtained experimental data. It was established that as criteria of biological significance of the results of mutagenicity evaluation in the Ames test it is reasonable to use not only the conservative approach based on the fold increase rule, but also to compare them with the data of the ranges of historical negative laboratory control.
Limitations. The study is limited to evaluating the results of experiments obtained using the standard plate test, but not the fluctuation format.
Conclusion. A conclusion about the presence of mutagenic activity of the test item in the Ames test can be made if the following criteria are fulfilled: the presence of a statistically significant increase in the number of revertants on the plates with the test item compared to the concomitant negative control; the presence of a concentration-effect relationship; the mean number of revertants for at least one of the concentrations tested, with or without metabolic activation, must exceed the upper limit of the distribution of the historical negative laboratory control; the number of revertants on the plates with the test item must be 2 or more times compared to that one in the negative control for TA97, TA98, TA100, TA102 and 3 or more for TA1535; the reproducible effects.
Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not need the approval of the biomedical ethics committee or other documents.
Author contribution:
Egorova O.V. — concept and design of the study, collecting and processing of material, writing the text;
Ilyushina N.A. — concept and design of the study, writing the text.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.
Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding. The study had no sponsorship.
Accepted: August 21, 2024 / Received: September 20, 2024 / Published: October 30, 2024
About the authors
Olga V. Egorova
Federal Budgetary Institution of Science “Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman” of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Email: egorova.ov@fncg.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4748-8771
PhD of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Dept. of Genetic Toxicology of the Institute of Hygiene, Toxicology of Pesticides and Chemical Safety of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Human Well-being, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation
e-mail: egorova.ov@fncg.ru
Nataliya A. Ilyushina
Federal Budgetary Institution of Science “Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman” of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Author for correspondence.
Email: ilushina.na@fncg.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9122-9465
PhD, DSci., Head of the Dept. of Genetic Toxicology of the Institute of Hygiene, Toxicology of Pesticides and Chemical Safety of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Human Well-being, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation
e-mail: ilushina.na@fncg.ru
References
- Maron D., Ames B.N. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutation Research. Environ. Mutagen. 1983; 113(3–4): 173–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(83)90010-9
- Fonstein L.M., Abilev S.K., Bobrinev E.В., et al. Methods of primary detection of the genetic activity of environmental pollutants using bacterial test systems: guidelines [Metody pervichnogo vyyavleniya geneticheskoj aktivnosti zagryaznitelej sredy s pomoshch’yu bakterial’nyh test-sistem: metodicheskie ukazaniya]. Moscow; 1985. (in Russian)
- Guidelines on short-term methods for detection of mutagenic and cancerogenic chemicals. A Co-Publishing of United Nations Environment Programme, International Labour Organization and World Health Organization [Rukovodstvo po kratkosrochnym testam dlya vyyavleniya mutagennyh i kancerogennyh himicheskih veshchestv. Sovmestnoe izdanie Programmy OON po okruzhayushchej srede, Mezhdunarodnoj organizacii truda i Vsemirnoj organizacii zdravoohraneniya]. Moscow: Meditsina; 1989: 26–38. (in Russian)
- Nicolette J., Dakoulas E., Pant K., et al. A comparison of 24 chemicals in the six-well bacterial reverse mutation assay to the standard 100-mm Petri plate bacterial reverse mutation assay in two laboratories. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018; 100: 134–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.10.005
- Levy D.D., Zeiger E., Escobar P.A., et al. Recommended criteria for the evaluation of bacterial mutagenicity data (Ames test). Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2019; (848): 403074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.07.004
- Schoeny R., Cross K.P., DeMarini D.M., et al. Revisiting the bacterial mutagenicity assays: Report by a workgroup of the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT). Mutation Research. Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2020; 849: 503137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2020.503137
- OECD, Test 471: 2020, IDT. Bacterial reverse mutation test.
- Hamel A., Roy M., Proudlock R. The bacterial reverse mutation test. Chapter 4. In Genetic Toxicology Testing. A Laboratory Manual. 2016
- Manual on development and use of FAO and WHO specifications for pesticides First edition – third revision March 2016. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/246192/1/WHO-HTM-NTD-WHOPES-2016.4-eng.pdf
- Guidance Document on the Assessment of the Equivalence of Technical Materials of Substances regulated under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. SANCO/10597/2003–rev. 10.1, 13 July 2012. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/plant/docs/pesticides_guidance_equivalence-chem-substances_en.pdf
- Ilyushina N.A. Assessment of the equivalence of technical materials of analogous pesticides to original active substances on the basis of “mutagenicity” criterion. Ekologicheskaya genetika. 2019; 17(2): 101–112. https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen172101-112
- Overview of China’s new pesticide regulations. 2020. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://agrochemical.chemlinked.com/agropedia/overview-chinas-new-pesticide-regulations (дата обращения: 27.06.2024)
- Ilyushina N.A., Egorova O.V., Revazova Yu.A. Applicability of the Ames test and micronucleus test in vivo for the evaluation of the equivalence of pesticide technical grade active ingredients compared to original active substances. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2019; 98(2): 219–24. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2019-98-2-219-224 (In Russian)
- Abilev S.K., Glazer V.M. Mutagenesis with the Basics of Genotoxicology: A Textbook [Mutagenez s osnovami genotoksikologii: uchebnoe posobie]. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Nestor-History; 2015. (In Russian)
- Kirkland D., Reeve L., Gatehouse D., Vanparys P. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins. Mutat Res. 2011; 18; 721(1): 27–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.12.015
- Abilev S.K. Identification and prediction of mutagenic activity of chemical compounds of the environment: Diss. Moscow; 2003. (in Russian)
- Egorova O.V., Demidova Yu.V., Ilyushina N.A. Assessment of experimental conditions affecting spontaneous mutation level of Salmonella strains used in the Ames test. Gigiena i Sanitariya (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2021; 100(7): 736–743. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-7-736-743 (In Russian)
Supplementary files
