Modeling of the auroral hiss spatial structure and comparison with the observed results

A. S. Nikitenko; Никитенко А. С.; Yu. V. Fedorenko; Федоренко Ю. В.; J. Manninen; Маннинен Ю.; O. M. Lebed; Лебедь О. М.; E. B. Beketova; Бекетова Е. Б.

doi:10.31857/S0367676522700259

Modeling of the auroral hiss spatial structure and comparison with the observed results

Authors: Nikitenko A.S.¹, Fedorenko Y.V.¹, Manninen J.², Lebed O.M.¹, Beketova E.B.³
Affiliations:
1. Polar Geophysical Institute
2. Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory
3. Murmansk Arctic State University, Branch in Apatity
Issue: Vol 87, No 1 (2023)
Pages: 134-140
Section: Articles
URL: https://rjpbr.com/0367-6765/article/view/654517
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0367676522700259
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JVARNR
ID: 654517

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

We present the results of the auroral hiss propagation modeling from the source region to the ground and its comparison with the observed results. We analyzed propagation conditions explaining locality of the auroral hiss illuminated area observed on the ground. It is shown that quasielectrostatic waves with random amplitudes, phases and wavenormals directions representing the auroral hiss propagating to the ground form two wave beams in the meridional plane. The scattering of these waves at altitudes of 800–1300 km can cause the observed locality of the illuminated area.

References

Jørgensen T.S. // J. Geophys. Res. 1968. V. 73. No. 3. P. 1055.
Lim T.L., Laaspere T. // J. Geophys. Res. 1972 V. 77. No. 22. P. 4145.
Sazhin S.S., Bullough K., Hayakawa M. // Planet. Space Sci. 1993. V. 41. No. 2. P. 153.
Hoffman R.A., Laaspere T. // J. Geophys. Res. 1972. V. 77. No. 4. P. 640.
Mosier S.R., Gurnett D.A. // J. Geophys. Res. 1972. V. 77. No. 7. P. 1137.
Beghin C., Rauch J.L., Bosqued J.M. // J. Geophys. Res. 1989 V. 94. No. A2. P. 1159.
Stix T.H. Waves in plasmas. N.Y.: Amer. Inst. Phys., 1992. 579 p.
Bell T.F., Ngo H.D. // J. Geophys. Res. 1988. V. 93. No. A4. P. 2599.
Sonwalkar V.S., Harikumar J. // J. Geophys. Res. 2000. V. 105. No. A8. Art. No. 18867.
Лебедь О.М., Федоренко Ю.В., Маннинен Ю. и др. // Геомагн. и аэроном. 2019. Т. 59. № 5. С. 618; Lebed O.M., Fedorenko Yu.V., Manninen J. et al. // Geomagn. Aeron. 2019. V. 59. No. 5. P. 577.
Никитенко А.С., Маннинен Ю., Федоренко Ю.В. и др. // Геомагн. и аэроном. 2022. Т. 62. № 3. С. 336; Nikitenko A.S., Manninen J., Fedorenko Yu.V. et al. // Geomagn. Aeron. 2022. V. 62. No. 3. P. 209.
Никитенко А.С., Лебедь О.М., Федоренко Ю.В. и др. // Изв. РАН. Сер. физ. 2021. Т. 85. № 3. С. 398; Nikitenko A.S., Lebed O.M., Fedorenko Yu.V. et al. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2021. V. 85. No. 3. P. 287.
Рытов С.М. Введение в статистическую радиофизику. М.: Наука, 1976.
Yearby K.H., Smith A.J. // J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 1994. V. 56. No. 11. P. 1499.
Machida S., Tsuruda K. // J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 1984. V. 89. No. A3. P. 1675.
Tsuruda K., Machida S., Terasawa T. et al. // J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 1982. V. 87. No. A2. P. 742.
Inan U.S., Bell T.F. // J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 1977. V. 82. No. 19. P. 2819.
https://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/modelweb/models/iri2016_ vitmo.php.
Davies A., Lester M., Robinson T.R. // Ann. Geophys. 1997. V. 15. No. 12. P. 1557.
Banks P. // Planet. Space Sci. 1966. V. 14. No. 11. P. 1085.
https://kauai.ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/instantrun/msis.
Walter F. Nonducted VLF propagation in the magnetosphere. Stanford: Stanford University, 1969. 143 p.
Lehtinen N.G., Inan U.S. // J. Geophys. Res. 2008. V. 113. No. A6. P. 63.
Lehtinen N.G., Marshall R.A., Inan U.S. // J. Geophys. Res. 2010. V. 115. No. A7. Art. No. A00E40.
Рытов С.М., Кравцов Ю.А., Татарский В.И. Введение в статистическую радиофизику. Ч. 2. Случайные поля. М.: Наука, 1978.
Korja T., Engels M., Zhamaletdinov A. et al. // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2002. V. 54. P. 535.