Synthesis of Magnesium- and Aluminum-Based Mixed Oxide Systems by Low and High Supersaturation Methods

V. V. Fadeev; Фадеев В. В.; A. P. Tronov; Тронов А. П.; A. V. Tolchev; Толчев А. В.; D. M. Galimov; Галимов Д. М.; V. E. Zhivulin; Живулин В. Е.; R. S. Morozov; Морозов Р. С.; V. V. Avdin; Авдин В. В.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X22602036

Synthesis of Magnesium- and Aluminum-Based Mixed Oxide Systems by Low and High Supersaturation Methods

Authors: Fadeev V.V.¹, Tronov A.P.¹, Tolchev A.V.¹, Galimov D.M.², Zhivulin V.E.², Morozov R.S.², Avdin V.V.²
Affiliations:
1. Chelyabinsk State University
2. South Ural State University
Issue: Vol 68, No 5 (2023)
Pages: 613-622
Section: СИНТЕЗ И СВОЙСТВА НЕОРГАНИЧЕСКИХ СОЕДИНЕНИЙ
URL: https://rjpbr.com/0044-457X/article/view/665255
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22602036
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SNEVVM
ID: 665255

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

Magnesium–aluminum layered double hydroxides and mixed oxides based on them were obtained by high and low supersaturation methods and analyzed. It was shown that the phase composition and formation of nano-sized particles with a large surface area is significantly affected by the rate of introduction of magnesium–aluminum systems into the medium of the precipitated material. All of the obtained samples were studied by thermogravimetric analysis with mass-spectrometric detection, X-ray diffractometry, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and infrared spectroscopy.

Keywords

layered double hydroxide, mixed oxide, magnesium, aluminum, nanoparticles, active surface area

References

Hájek M. // Chem. Eng. J. 2015. V. 263. P. 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.006
Tanaka R., Ogino. I., Mukai S.R. // ACS Omega. 2018. V. 3. № 12. P. 16916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02557
Kuljiraseth J. // Appl. Catal. B. 2019. V. 243. P. 415. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.073
Kocík J. // J. Mol. Catal. 2021. V. 516. P. 111946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111946
Octavian D.P., Didier Tichit I.C.M. // Appl. Clay Sci. 2012. V. 61. P. 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.03.006
Dixit M., Manish D., Manish M. et al. // Chem. Eng. Ind. J. 2013. V. 19. № 2. P. 458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.08.028
Climent M.J., Corma A., Iborra S., Primo J. // J. Catal. 1994. V. 151. № 1. P. 60. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1995.1008
Pérez C.N. // Química Nova. 2009. V. 32. № 9. P. 2341. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422009000900020
Hora L. // Catalysis Today. 2014. V. 223. P. 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.09.022
Jorge P., Joseph L., François F. // Catalysis J. 2002. V. 211. № 1. P. 150. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.3706
Bolognini M. // Catal. Today. 2002. V. 75. № 1–4. P. 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00050-0
Xiao Z. // Mol. Catal. 2017. V. 436. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2017.04.016
Cosano D., Hidalgo-Carrillo J., Esquivel D. et al. // J. Porous Mater. 2020. V. 27. № 2. P. 441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-019-00825-8
Quesada J., Faba L., Diaz E., Ordonez S. // Appl. Catal. A. 2017. V. 542. P. 271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2017.06.001
He J., Wei M., Li B. et al. // Structure and Bonding Layered Double Hydroxides. 2006. V. 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/430/006
Горелик С.С., Расторгуев Л.Н., Скаков Ю.А. Рентгенографический и электронно-оптический анализ. М.: МИСИС, 1994. 328 с.
Kong L. // Chem. Eng. J. 2019. V. 371. P. 893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.116
Leont`eva N.N., Drozdov V.D., Bel`skaya O.B., Cherepanova S.V. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2020. V. 90. № 3. P. 509. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363220030275
Nguyễn K.D.H., Hoàng N.D. // Vietnam J. Sci. Technol. 2015. V. 52. № 6. P. 755. https://doi.org/10.15625/0866-708X/52/6/3636
Libor Č., Petr K., Lucie S., Martin H. // Top. Catal. 2013 V. 56. № 9–10. P. 586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-013-0008-3
Débora L.C., Roberto R.A., Michelly T.R. et al. // Appl. Catal. A. 2012. V. 415–416. P. 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.12.009
Kikhtyanin O., Capek L., Smoláková L. et al. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017. V. 56. № 45. P. 13411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03367
Masoud S., Afshin T.M., Seyed A.H., Sakineh M. // J. Water Environ. Nanotechnol. 2021. V. 6. № 1. P. 72. https://doi.org/10.22090/jwent.2021.01.007
Huang P.P. // RSC. Adv. 2015. V. 5. № 14. P. 10412. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA15160G
Varga G., Szabados M., Kukovecz Á. et al. // Mater. Res. Lett. 2020. V. 8. № 2. P. 68. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2019.1700199
Abniki M., Moghimi A., Azizinejad F. // JSCS. 2020. V. 85. № 9. P. 1223. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC191011004A
Chen L., Sun B., Wang X. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. B. 2013. V. 1. № 17. P. 2268. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TB00044C
Huang P.-P., Cao C.-Y., Wei F. et al. // RSC Adv. 2015. V. 5. № 14. P. 10412. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA15160G
Cardinale A.M., Carbone C., Consani S. et al. // Crystals. 2020. V. 10. № 6. P. 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10060443
Hag-Soo K., Yohtaro Y., Je-Deok K. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2010. V. 181. № 19–20. P. 883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2010.04.037
Wang X., Zhu X., Meng X. // RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. № 56. P. 34984. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra04646d
Aisawa S., Nakada C., Hirahara H. et al. // Appl. Clay Science. 2019. V. 180. P. 105205. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.clay.2019.105205
Zaghouane-Boudiaf H., Boutahala M., Arab L. // Chem. Eng. J. 2012. V. 187. P. 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.112
Thommes M., Kaneko K., Neimark A.V. et al. // Pure Appl. Chem. 2015. V. 87. № 9–10. P. 1051. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117