Possibilities and limitations of various variants of the X-ray fluorescence analysis method in the study of the chemical composition of ancient ceramics

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Представлен обзор публикаций, посвященных применению различных вариантов рентгенофлуоресцентного метода анализа для исследования химического состава древней керамики и глины. Рассмотрены примеры использования стационарных волнодисперсионных и энергодисперсионных рентгенофлуоресцентных спектрометров, портативных рентгеновских анализаторов, спектрометров с поликапиллярной оптикой (микрорентгенофлуоресцентный анализ) и геометрией полного внешнего отражения. Несмотря на то, что аналитическим сигналом во всех случаях является рентгеновская флуоресценция, перечисленные варианты рентгенофлуоресцентного метода отличаются кругом определяемых элементов, способами подготовки проб к анализу и способами расчета концентраций элементов. Представлен также опыт авторов по применению описанных вариантов рентгенофлуоресцентного метода в рамках комплексного исследования археологических материалов эпохи каменного века для исторической реконструкции хозяйственной деятельности населения Байкальской Сибири.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. M. Chubarov

Институт земной коры Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук; Институт геохимии им. А.П. Виноградова Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук

Author for correspondence.
Email: chubarov@igc.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Лермонтова ул., 128, Иркутск, 664033; Фаворского ул., 1А, Иркутск, 664033

G. V. Pashkova

Институт земной коры Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук; Иркутский государственный университет

Email: chubarov@igc.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Лермонтова ул., 128, Иркутск, 664033; Карла Маркса ул., 1, Иркутск, 664003

A. S. Maltsev

Институт земной коры Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук

Email: chubarov@igc.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Лермонтова ул., 128, Иркутск, 664033

M. M. Mukhamedova

Институт земной коры Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук; Иркутский государственный университет

Email: chubarov@igc.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Лермонтова ул., 128, Иркутск, 664033; Карла Маркса ул., 1, Иркутск, 664003

M. A. Statkus

Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова

Email: chubarov@igc.irk.ru

химический факультет

Russian Federation, 664033 Ленинские горы, 1, стр. 3, Москва, 119991

A. G. Revenko

Институт земной коры Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук

Email: chubarov@igc.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Лермонтова ул., 128, Иркутск, 664033

References

  1. Бердников И.М., Лохов Д.Н. Керамика в археологии: описание, анализ, методы исследования. Иркутск: Изд-во ИГУ, 2014. 163 с.
  2. Čechák T., Hložek M., Musílek L., Trojek T. X-ray fluorescence as a tool for investigating archaeological finds // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A. 2007. V. 580. № 1. P. 717.doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.133
  3. Ревенко А.Г., Ревенко В.А. Применение рентгеноспектрального метода анализа для исследования материалов культурного наследия // Методы и объекты химического анализа. 2007. Т. 2. № 1. С. 4.
  4. Цизин Г.И., Золотов Ю.А. Какие аналитические приборы производят в России? // Журн. аналит. химии. 2021. Т. 76. № 4. С. 369.doi: 10.31857/S0044450221040137
  5. Пашкова Г.В., Мухамедова М.М., Чубаров В.М., Мальцев А.С., Амосова А.А., Демонтерова Е.И., Михеева Е.А., Шергин Д.Л., Пеллинен В.А. Сравнительный анализ методик рентгенофлуоресцентного определения элементного состава археологической керамики из малых навесок // Аналитика и контроль. 2021. Т. 25. № 1. С. 20.doi: 10.15826/analitika.2020.25.1.001
  6. Maltsev A.S., Pashkova G.V., Fernández-Ruiz R., Demonterova E.I., Shuliumova A.N., Umarova N.N., Shergin D.L., Mukhamedova M.M., Chubarov V.M., Mikheeva E.A. Characterization of archaeological ceramics from eastern Siberia by total-reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and principal component analysis // Spectrochim. Acta B. 2021. V. 175. Article 106012.doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2020.106012
  7. Maltsev A.S., Umarova N.N., Pashkova G.V., Mukhamedova M.M., Shergin D.L., Panchuk V.V., Kirsanov D.O., Demonterova E.I. Combination of total-reflection X-ray fluorescence method and chemometric techniques for provenance study of archaeological ceramics // Molecules. 2023. V. 28. № 3. Article 1099. doi: 10.3390/molecules28031099
  8. Pashkova G.V., Statkus M.A., Mukhamedova M.M., Finkelshtein A.L., Abdrashitova I.V., Belozerova O.Y., Chubarov V.M., Amosova A.A., Maltsev A.S., Demonterova E.I., Shergin D.L. A workflow for uncertainty assessment in elemental analysis of archaeological ceramics: A case study of neolithic coarse pottery from Eastern Siberia // Heritage. 2023. V. 6. P. 4434.doi: 10.3390/heritage6050234
  9. Коваль В.Ю. Первичная фиксация массового керамического материала (на памятниках эпохи Средневековья и раннего железного века лесной зоны Восточной Европы). М.: ИА РАН, 2016. 128 с.
  10. Глушков И.Г. Керамика как исторический источник. Новосибирск: ИАЭТ СО РАН, 1996. 328 с.
  11. Краснова Т.Н. Исследование причин разрушения археологической керамики вследствие неквалифицированной реставрации // Журн. ин-та наследия. 2020. Т. 20. № 1. С. 11. doi: 10.34685/HI.2020.77.73.010
  12. Hall M. X-ray fluorescence-energy dispersive (ED-XRF) and wavelength dispersive (WD-XRF) spectrometry / The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Ceramic Analysis / Ed. Hunt A. Oxford University Press, 2016. P. 341.doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199681532.013.21
  13. Boulanger M.T., Fehrenbach S.S., Glascock M.D. Experimental evaluation of sample-extraction methods and the potential for contamination in ceramic specimens // Archaeometry. 2013. V. 55. № 5. P. 880.doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2012.00706.x
  14. De La Fuente G.A. Post-depositional chemical alterations in archaeological ceramics: A critical review and implications for their conservation // Boletín del Laboratorio de Petrología y Conservación Cerámica. 2008. V. 1. № 2. P. 21.
  15. Ревенко А.Г. Рентгеноспектральный флуоресцентный анализ природных материалов. Новосибирск: Наука, 1994. 264 с.
  16. Revenko A.G. X-ray fluorescence analysis of rocks, soils and sediments // X-Ray Spectrom. 2002. V. 31. № 3. P. 264.doi: 10.1002/xrs.564
  17. Ревенко А.Г. Рентгенофлуоресцентный анализ горных пород, почв и донных отложений // Аналитика и контроль. 2002. Т. 6. № 3. С. 231.
  18. Финкельштейн А.Л., Афонин В.П. Расчёт интенсивности рентгеновской флуоресценции / Методы рентгеноспектрального анализа / Под ред. Лонциха С.В. Новосибирск: Наука, 1986. С. 5.
  19. Klein M., Jesse F., Kasper H.U., Golden A. Chemical characterization of ancient pottery from Sudan by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF), electron microprobe analyses (EPMA) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) // Archaeometry. 2004. V. 46. № 3. P. 339. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00162.x
  20. Bouquillon A. Heaven and Earth – ‘Madonne col Bambino’ and ‘Rustiques figulines’ // Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2004. V. 79. № 2. P. 161. doi: 10.1007/s00339-004-2507-3
  21. Zhu D., Cheng H.S., Lin J.W., Yang F.J. PIXE study on the provenance of Chinese ancient porcelain // Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2006. V. 249. P. 633. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2006.03.070
  22. Gazulla M.F., Vicente S., Orduña M., Ventura M.J. Chemical analysis of very small-sized samples by wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence // X-Ray Spectrom. 2012. V. 41. № 3. P. 176. doi: 10.1002/xrs.2381
  23. Ravisankar R., Naseerutheen A., Raja Annamalai G., Chandrasekaran A., Rajalakshmi A., Kanagasabapathy K.V., Prasad M.V.R., Satpathy K.K. The analytical investigations of ancient pottery from Kaveripakkam, Vellore dist, Tamilnadu by spectroscopic techniques // Spectrochim. Acta A. 2014. V. 121. P. 457. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.10.110
  24. De Vleeschouwer F., Renson V., Claeys P., Nys K., Bindler R. Quantitative WD-XRF calibration for small ceramic samples and their source material // Geoarchaeology. 2011. V. 26. № 3. P. 440. doi: 10.1002/gea.20353
  25. Moroni B., Conti C. Technological features of Renaissance pottery from Deruta (Umbria, Italy): An experimental study // Appl. Clay Sci. 2006. V. 33. № 3-4. P. 230.doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2006.05.002
  26. Fabbri B., Gualtieri S., Mingazzini C., Spadea P., Casadio P., Costantini R., Malisani G. Archaeometric investigations of sgraffito ceramic tiles (fifteenth-sixteenth centuries) recovered from excavations in Udine (North-East Italy) // Archaeometry. 2000. V. 42. № 2. P. 317. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00884.x
  27. Hein A., Tsolakidou A., Iliopoulos I., Mommsen H., Buxeda i Garrigós J., Montana G., Kilikoglou V. Standardisation of elemental analytical techniques applied to provenance studies of archaeological ceramics: an inter laboratory calibration study // Analyst. 2002. V. 127. № 4. P. 542.doi: 10.1039/B109603F
  28. Орузбаева Г.Т., Касымова М.Т. Исследования древней и средневековой керамики Кыргызстана рентгенофлюоресцентным анализом // Изв. вузов. Строительство. 2019. № 3. С. 101.doi: 10.32683/0536-1052-2019-723-3-101-108
  29. Beltrame M., Liberato M., Mirão J., Santos H., Barrulas P., Branco F., Gonçalves L., Candeias A., Schiavon N. Islamic and post Islamic ceramics from the town of Santarém (Portugal): The continuity of ceramic technology in a transforming society // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2019. V. 23. P. 910. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.11.029
  30. Georgiou C.D., Sun H.J., McKay C.P., Grintzalis K., Papapostolou I., Zisimopoulos D., Panagiotidis K., Zhang G., Koutsopoulou E., Christidi G.E., Margiolaki I. Evidence for photochemical production of reactive oxygen species in desert soils // Nat. Commun. 2015. V. 6. № 1. Article 7100. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8100
  31. Longobucco R. Determination of major and minor constituents in ceramic materials by X-ray spectrometry // Anal. Chem. 1962. V. 34. P. 1263.doi: 10.1021/ac60190a021
  32. Müller N.S., Hein A., Georgakopoulou M., Kilikoglou V., Kiriatzi E. The effect of inter- and intra-source variation: A comparison between WD-XRF and NAA data from Cretan clay deposits // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2018. V. 21. P. 929. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.09.023
  33. Menne J., Holzheid A., Heilmann C. Multi-scale measurements of neolithic ceramics – A methodological comparison of portable energy-dispersive XRF, wavelength-dispersive XRF, and microcomputer tomography // Minerals. 2020. V. 10. P. 931. doi: 10.3390/min10100931
  34. Georgakopoulou M., Hein A., Müller N.S., Kiriatzi E. Development and calibration of a WDXRF routine applied to provenance studies on archaeological ceramics // X-Ray Spectrom. 2017. V. 46. № 3. P. 186. doi: 10.1002/xrs.2745
  35. Ichikawa S., Matsumoto T., Nakamura T. X-ray fluorescence determination using glass bead samples and synthetic calibration standards for reliable routine analyses of ancient pottery // Anal. Methods. 2016. V. 8. № 22. P. 4452. doi: 10.1039/c6ay01061j
  36. Hein A., Dobosz A., Day P.M., Kilikoglou V. Portable ED-XRF as a tool for optimizing sampling strategy: The case study of a Hellenistic amphora assemblage from Paphos (Cyprus) // J. Archaeol. Sci. 2021. V. 133. Article 105436. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2021.105436
  37. Papachristodoulou C., Oikonomou A., Ioannides K., Gravani K. A study of ancient pottery by means of X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, multivariate statistics and mineralogical analysis. // Anal. Chim. Acta. 2006. V. 573–574. P. 347. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.02.012
  38. Ichikawa S., Nakayama K., Nakamura T. Loose-powder technique for X-ray fluorescence analysis of ancient pottery using a small (100 mg) powdered sample // X-Ray Spectrom. 2012. V. 41. № 5. P. 288. doi: 10.1002/xrs.2394
  39. Tsolakidou A., Kilikoglou V. Comparative analysis of ancient ceramics by neutron activation analysis, inductively coupled plasma-optical-emission spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, and X-ray fluorescence // Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002. V. 374. № 3. P.566. doi: 10.1007/s00216-002-1444-2
  40. Buxeda i Garrigos J., Cau Ontiveros M.A., Kilikoglou V. Chemical variability in clays and pottery from a traditional cooking pot production village: Testing assumptions in Pereruela // Archaeometry. 2003. V. 45. № 1. P. 1. doi: 10.1111/1475-4754.00093
  41. Ichikawa S., Nakamura T. X-ray fluorescence analysis with micro glass beads using milligram-scale siliceous samples for archeology and geochemistry // Spectrochim. Acta B. 2014. V. 96. P. 40. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2014.04.002
  42. Nakayama K., Ichikawa S., Nakamura T. Glass bead with minimized amount (11 mg) of sample for X-ray fluorescence determination of archaeological ceramics // X-Ray Spectrom. 2011. V. 41. № 1. P. 16. doi: 10.1002/xrs.1371
  43. Иванов А.В., Демонтерова Е.И., Ревенко А.Г., Шарыгин И.С., Козырева Е.А., Алексеев С.В. История и современное состояние аналитических исследований в Институте земной коры СО РАН: центр коллективного пользования “Геодинамика и геохронология” // Геодинамика и тектонофизика. 2022. Т. 13. № 2. 0582. doi: 10.5800/GT-2022-13-2-0582
  44. Скузоватов С.Ю., Белозерова О.Ю., Васильева И.Е., Зарубина О.В., Канева Е.В., Сокольникова Ю.В., Чубаров В.М. Центр коллективного пользования “Изотопно-геохимических исследований” ИГХ СО РАН: современное состояние методов изучения вещества на микро- и макроуровне // Геодинамика и тектонофизика. 2022. Т. 13. № 2. 0585. doi: 10.5800/GT-2022-13-2-0585
  45. Амосова А.А., Пантеева С.В., Татаринов В.В., Чубаров В.М., Финкельштейн А.Л. Рентгенофлуоресцентное определение основных породообразующих элементов из образцов массой 50 и 110 мг // Аналитика и контроль. 2015. T. 19. № 2. С. 130. doi: 10.15826/analitika.2015.19.2.009
  46. Amosova A.A., Panteeva S.V., Chubarov V.M., Finkelshtein A.L. Determination of major elements by wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and trace elements by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in igneous rocks from the same fused sample (110 mg) // Spectrochim. Acta B. 2016. V. 122. P. 62. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2016.06.001
  47. Hunt A.M.W., Speakman R.J. Portable XRF analysis of archaeological sediments and ceramics // J. Archaeol. Sci. 2015. V. 53. P. 626. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.11.031
  48. Frahm E., Doonan R.C.P. The technological versus methodological revolution of portable XRF in archaeology // J. Archaeol. Sci. 2013. V. 40. P. 1425. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.10.013
  49. Frahm E. Ceramic studies using portable XRF: From experimental tempered ceramics to imports and imitations at Tell Mozan, Syria // J. Archaeol. Sci. 2018. V. 90. P. 12. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2017.12.002
  50. Braekmans D., Boschloos V., Hameeuw H., Van der Perre A. Tracing the provenance of unfired ancient Egyptian clay figurines from Saqqara through non-destructive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry // Microchem. J. 2019. V. 145. P. 1207. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2018.12.029
  51. Bonizzoni L., Galli A., Gondola M., Martini M. Comparison between XRF, TXRF, and PXRF analyses for provenance classification of archaeological bricks // X-Ray Spectrom. 2013. V. 42. № 4. P. 262. doi: 10.1002/xrs.2465
  52. Speakman R.J., Little N.C., Creel D., Miller M.R., Iñañez J.G. Sourcing ceramics with portable XRF spectrometers? A comparison with INAA using Mimbres pottery from the American Southwest // J. Archaeol. Sci. 2011. V. 38. P. 3483. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.08.011
  53. Forster N., Grave P., Vickery N., Kealhofer L. Non-destructive analysis using PXRF: Methodology and application to archaeological ceramics // X-Ray Spectrom. 2011. V. 40. P. 389. doi: 10.1002/xrs.1360
  54. Aimers J.J., Farthing D.J., Shugar A.N. Handheld XRF analysis of Maya ceramics: A pilot study presenting issues related to quantification and calibration / Handheld XRF for Art and Archaeology / Eds. Shugar A.N., Mass J. L. Leuven University Press, 2013. P. 423. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt9qdzfs.17
  55. Lemière B. A review of pXRF (field portable X-ray fluorescence) applications for applied geochemistry // J. Geochem. Explor. 2018. V. 188. P. 350.doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.02.006
  56. Conrey R.M., Goodman-Elgar M., Bettencourt N., Seyfarth A., Van Hoose A., Wolff J.A. Calibration of a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer in the analysis of archaeological samples using influence coefficients // Geochem.: Explor., Environ., Anal. 2014. V. 14. P. 291.doi: 10.1144/geochem2013-198
  57. Кабатов С.А., Курочкина С.А., Алибеков С.Я. Использование естественнонаучных методов для анализа керамики селища Вёжи Костромской области (по археологическим материалам 2015 года) / Археология Подмосковья: материалы научного семинара. Вып. 13 / Под ред. Эгноватовой А.В. М.: ИА РАН, 2017. С. 188.
  58. Ceccarelli L, Rossetti I, Primavesi L, Stoddart S. Non-destructive method for the identification of ceramic production by portable X-rays Fluorescence (pXRF). A case study of amphorae manufacture in central Italy // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2016. V. 10. P. 253. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.10.002
  59. Hein A., Kilikoglou V. Compositional variability of archaeological ceramics in the eastern Mediterranean and implications for the design of provenance studies // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2017. V. 16. P. 564. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.03.020
  60. LeMoine J.B., Halperin C.T. Comparing INAA and pXRF analytical methods for ceramics: A case study with Classic Maya wares // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2021. V. 36. Article 102819. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102819
  61. Johnson J. Accurate measurements of low Z elements in sediments and archaeological ceramics using portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) // J. Archaeol. Method Theory. 2012. V. 21. P. 563. doi: 10.1007/s10816-012-9162-3
  62. Marino M.D., Stoner W.D., Fargher L.F., Glascock M.D. Comparing three sample preparation techniques for portable X-ray fluorescence: A case study of Coarse Orange ceramic jars, Veracruz, Mexico // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2022. V. 41. Article 103315. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103315
  63. García-Heras M., Fernández-Ruiz R., Tornero J.D. Analysis of archaeological ceramics by TXRF and contrasted with NAA // J. Archaeol. Sci. 1997. V. 24. P. 1003. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0178
  64. García-Heras M., Blackman M.J., Fernández-Ruiz R., Bishop R.L. Assessing ceramic compositional data: A comparison of total reflection x-ray fluorescence and instrumental neutron activation analysis on Late Iron Age Spanish Celtiberian ceramics // Archaeometry. 2001. V. 43. P. 325. doi: 10.1111/1475-4754.00020
  65. Bohus L.S., de Antczak M.M.M., Greaves E.D., Antczak A., Bermudez J., Kasztovszky Z., Poirier T., Simonits A. Incipient archaeometry in Venezuela: Provenance study of pre-Hispanic pottery figurines // J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2005. V. 265. P. 247.doi: 10.1007/s10967-005-0816-4
  66. Fernández-Ruiz R., García-Heras M. Study of archaeological ceramics by total-reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry: Semi-quantitative approach // Spectrochim. Acta B. 2007. V. 62. P. 1123. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2007.06.015
  67. Horcajada P., Roldán C., Vidal C., Rodenas I., Carballo J., Murcia S.,. Juanes D. Archaeometric study of ceramic figurines from the Maya settlement of La Blanca (Petal, Guatemala) // Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2014. V. 97. P. 275. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.12.016
  68. Cariati F., Fermo P., Gilardoni S., Galli A., Milazzo M. A new approach for archaeological ceramics analysis using total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry // Spectrochim. Acta B. 2003. V. 58. P. 177. doi: 10.1016/s0584-8547(02)00253-7
  69. Allegretta I., Ciasca B., Pizzigallo M.D.R., Lattanzio V.M.T., Terzano R. A fast method for the chemical analysis of clays by total-reflection X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (TXRF) // Appl. Clay Sci. 2019. V. 180. Article 105201. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2019.105201
  70. Fernández-Ruiz R., García-Heras M. Analysis of archaeological ceramics by total-reflection X-ray fluorescence: Quantitative approaches // Spectrochim. Acta B. 2008. V. 63. P. 975. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2008.06.004
  71. Пономаренко В.О., Сарычев Д.А., Водолажская Л.Н. Применение рентгенофлуоресцентного анализа для исследования химического состава амфорной керамики // Вестник Южного научного центра РАН. 2012. Т. 8. № 1. C. 9.
  72. Мальцев А.С., Пашкова Г.В. Применение метода рентгенофлуоресцентной спектрометрии с полным внешним отражением (TXRF) к геологическим объектам: опыт лаборатории TXRF (ЦКП “Геодинамика и геохронология”) // Геодинамика и тектонофизика. 2022. Т. 13. № 2. Article 0601. doi: 10.5800/GT-2022-13-2s-060
  73. Adams F., Adriaens A., Aerts A., De Raedt I., Janssens K., Schaim O. Micro and surface analysis in art and archaeology // J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1997. V. 12. P. 257. doi: 10.1039/A606091I
  74. Pella P.A., Lankosz M. Highlights of X-ray spectrometry for microanalysis // X-ray Spectrom. 1997. V. 26. P. 327. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4539(199711/12)26:6<327::AID-XRS230>3.0.CO;2-5
  75. Kazakis N.A., Sakalis A.J., Tsiafakis D., Tsirliganis N.C. Ιsland of andros pottery in argilos? Archaeometric study using μ-XRF and multivariate statistical analisys // Mediterr. Archaeol. Archaeom. 2015. V. 15. № 3. P. 73. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18359
  76. Holakooei P., de Lapérouse J.-F., Carò F., Röhrs S., Franke U., Müller-Wiener M., Reiche I. Non-invasive scientific studies on the provenance and technology of early Islamic ceramics from Afrasiyab and Nishapur // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2019. V. 24. P. 759. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.02.029
  77. Eftekhari N., Holakooei P., Sayyadshahri H., Vaccaro C. Four shades of black: Non-invasive scientific studi-es on the painted potteries from Shahr-i Sokhta, eastern Iran // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2018. V. 22. P. 100. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.09.012
  78. Berthold C., Zimmer K.B., Scharf O., Koch-Brinkmann U., Bente K. Nondestructive, optical and X-ray analytics with high local resolution on ATTIC white-ground lekythoi // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2017. V. 16. P. 513. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.02.008
  79. Chaves R.C., Lima A., Coroado J., Teixeira A., Vilari-gues M., Leal N., Karra A., Monge Soares A.M. Medieval and early modern ceramics from Azemmour (Morocco)-Textural, mineralogical and chemical ana-lysis // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2018. V. 21. P. 1152. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.10.037
  80. Demirsar Arli B., Simsek Franci G., Kaya S., Arli H., Colomban P. Portable X-ray fluorescence (p-XRF) uncertainty estimation for glazed ceramic analysis: Case of Iznik tiles // Heritage. 2020. V. 3. P. 130. doi: 10.3390/heritage3040072
  81. Papadopoulou D.N., Zachariadis G.A., Anthemidis A.N., Tsirliganis N.C., Stratis J.A. Comparison of a portable micro-X-ray fluorescence spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry for the ancient ceramics analysis // Spectrochim. Acta B. 2004. V. 59. № 12. P. 1877. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2004.09.001
  82. Papadopoulou D., Sakalis A., Merousis N., Tsirliganis N.C. Study of decorated archeological ceramics by micro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 2007. V. 580. № 1. P. 743.
  83. Flewett S., Saintenoy T., Sepulveda M., Mosso E.F., Robles C., Vega K., Gutierrez S., Romero A., Finney L., Maxey E., Vogt S. Micro x-ray fluorescence study of late pre-Hispanic ceramics from the western slopes of the South Central Andes region in the Arica y Parinacota region, Chile: A new methodological approach // Appl. Spectrosc. 2016. V. 70. № 10. P. 1759. doi: 10.1177/0003702816654153
  84. Sakalis A.J., Kazakis N.A., Merousis N., Tsirliganis N.C. Study of Neolithic pottery from Polyplatanos (Imathia) using micro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, stereoscopic microscopy and multivariate statistical analysis // J. Cult. Herit. 2013. V. 14. № 6. P. 485. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.005
  85. Jaroszewicz J., De Nolf W., Janssens K., Michalski A., Falkenberg G. Advantages of combined μ-XRF and μ-XRD for phase characterization of Ti–B–C ceramics compared with conventional X-ray diffraction // Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008. V. 391. P. 1129. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-2097-6
  86. Papadopoulou D., Zachariadis G., Anthemidis A., Tsirliganis N., Stratis J. Development and optimisation of a portable micro-XRF method for in situ multi-element analysis of ancient ceramics // Talanta. 2006. V. 68. P. 1692. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.08.051
  87. Machado A.S., Oliveira D.F., Gama Filho H.S., Latini R., Bellido A.V.B., Assis J.T., Anjos M.J., Lopes R.T. Archeological ceramic artifacts characterization through computed microtomography and X-ray fluorescence // X-Ray Spectrom. 2017. V. 46. P. 427. doi: 10.1002/xrs.2786
  88. González I., Romero-Baena A., Galán E., Miras A., Castilla-Alcántara J.C., Campos P. Ceramic materials from Cuatrovitas archaelogical site (Spain). A mineralogical and chemical study for determining the provenance and the firing temperature // Appl. Clay Sci. 2018. V. 166. P. 38. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.09.003
  89. Schurr M.R., Donohue P.H., Simonetti A., Dawson E.L. Multi-element and lead isotope characterization of early nineteenth century pottery sherds from Native American and Euro-American sites // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2018. V. 20. P. 390.doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.05.014
  90. Panchuk V., Yaroshenko I., Legin A., Semenov V., Kirsanov D. Application of chemometric methods to XRF-data – A tutorial review // Anal. Chim. Acta. 2018. V. 1040. P. 19.doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.05.023
  91. Seetha D., Velraj G. Spectroscopic and statistical approach of archaeological artifacts recently excavated from Tamilnadu, South India // Spectrochim. Acta A. 2015. V. 149. P. 59. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.04.041
  92. Seetha D., Velraj G. FT-IR, XRD, SEM-EDS, EDXRF and chemometric analyses of archaeological artifacts recently excavated from Chandravalli in Karnataka State, South India // Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2019. V. 162. P. 114. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.03.017
  93. Araujo C.S., Appoloni C.R., Ikeoka R.A., Symanski L.C.P. Study of ceramics from Brazilian slave quarters of the XVIII and XIX centuries by EDXRF and multivariate analysis // Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2022. V. 191. Article 110560.doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110560
  94. Ikeoka R.A., Appoloni C.R., Rizzutto M.A., Bandeira A.M. Computed Radiography, PIXE and XRF analysis of pre-colonial pottery from Maranhão, Brazil // Microchem. J. 2018. V. 138. P. 384. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2017.12.020
  95. Liritzis I., Xanthopoulou V., Palamara E., Papageorgiou I., Iliopoulos I., Zacharias N., Vafiadou A., Karydas A.G. Characterization and provenance of ceramic artifacts and local clays from Late Mycenaean Kastrouli (Greece) by means of p-XRF screening and statistical analysis // J. Cult. Herit. 2020. V. 46. P. 61. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2020.06.004
  96. Jasiewicz J., Niedzielski P., Krueger M., Hildebrandt-Radke I., Michałowski A. Elemental variability of prehistoric ceramics from postglacial lowlands and its implications for emerging of pottery traditions – an example from the pre-roman iron age // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2021. V. 39. Article 103177. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103177
  97. Barone G., Crupi V., Longo F., Majolino D., Mazzoleni P., Spagnolo G., Venuti V., Aquilia E. Potentiality of non‐destructive XRF analysis for the determination of Corinthian B amphorae provenance // X-Ray Spectrom. V. 40. № 5. P. 333. doi: 10.1002/xrs.1347
  98. Emmitt J.J., McAlister A.J., Phillipps R.S., Holdaway S.J. Sourcing without sources: Measuring ceramic variability with pXRF // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2018. V. 17. P. 422. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.11.024
  99. Fornacelli C., Volpi V., Ponta E., Russo L., Briano A., Donati A., Giamello M., Bianchi G. Grouping ceramic variability with pXRF for pottery trade and trends in early medieval southern tuscany. Preliminary results from the Vetricella case study (Grosseto, Italy) // Appl. Sci. 2021. V. 11. № 24. P. 11859. doi: 10.3390/app112411859
  100. Ikeoka R.A., Appoloni C.R., Scorzelli R.B., dos Santos E., Rizzutto M.D.A., Bandeira A.M. Study of ancient pottery from the Brazilian Amazon Coast by EDXRF, PIXE, XRD, Mössbauer spectroscopy and Computed radiography // Minerals. 2022. V. 12. № 10. P. 1302. doi: 10.3390/min12101302
  101. Amadori M.L., Del Vais C., Fermo P., Pallante P. Archaeometric researches on the provenance of Mediterranean Archaic Phoenician and Punic pottery // Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017. V. 24. № 16. P. 13921. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7065-7
  102. Barone G., Mazzoleni P., Ingoglia C., Vanaria M.G. Archaeometric evidences of the 4th–2nd century BC amphorae productions in north eastern Sicily // J. Archaeol. Sci. 2011. V. 38. № 11. P. 3060. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.07.005
  103. Barone G., Lo Giudice A., Mazzoleni P., Pezzino A., Barilaro D., Crupi V., Triscari, M. Chemical characterization and statistical multivariate analysis of ancient pottery from Messina, Catania, Lentini and Siracusa (Sicily) // Archaeometry. 2005. V. 47. № 4. P. 745. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2005.00230.x
  104. Horcajada P., Roldán C., Vidal C., Rodenas I., Carballo J., Murcia S., Juanes D. Archaeometric study of ceramic figurines from the Maya settlement of La Blanca (Petal, Guatemala) // Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2014. V. 97. P. 275. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.12.016
  105. Odelli E., Palleschi V., Legnaioli S., Cantini F., Raneri S. Graph clustering and portable X-ray fluorescence: An application for in situ, fast and preliminary classification of transport amphoras // Spectrochim. Acta B. 2020. V. 172. Article 105966.doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2020.105966
  106. López-García P., Argote-Espino D., Fačevicová K. Statistical processing of compositional data. The case of ceramic samples from the archaeological site of Xalasco, Tlaxcala, Mexico // J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2018. V. 19. P. 100. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.02.023
  107. Barone G., Mazzoleni P., Spagnolo G.V., Raneri S. Artificial neural network for the provenance study of archaeological ceramics using clay sediment database // J. Cult. Herit. 2019. V. 38. P. 147.doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2019.02.004

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Graphs of accounts (a) and loads (b) calculated for the chemical composition of ceramic samples from the archaeological site using the principal component method.

Download (132KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. The experience of applying various variants of XRF to the study of the chemical composition of Neolithic ceramics of Baikal Siberia.

Download (277KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences