Hygienic and psychological assessment of the intensity of the remote educational process in grade schoolers

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Introduction. The management of the educational process for modern students is associated with the active and prolonged use of digital technologies and devices. If the studies of the past years have given a detailed and comprehensive assessment of hygienic risk factors in the traditional management of the educational process, now there is a need to clarify the hygienic safety of the management of the educational process in remote form and when using digital devices in teaching against the background of a high commitment of children and adolescents to use gadgets at leisure. 

Materials and methods. A comparative analysis of the intensity of the educational process in primary school students according to the federal recommendations of the Federal State Educational Institution “All-Russian Development Society for School and University Medicine and Health”-16-2015 (version 1.1) “Hygienic assessment of the intensity of students’ learning activities” in traditional and distance education forms according to the timing of seventy five lessons in mathematics and Russian language. 

Results. In the distance learning form, compared with the traditional one, the intensity of educational work was found to increase from 2.9±0.05 points (class 3.1) to 3.4±0.02 points (class 3.1), p≤0.05 due to intense 2 degrees of intellectual loads (3.6±0.01 points), sensory loads (3.6±0.03 points), monotony (3.7±0.03 points) and intensity of the 1st degree of the mode of educational activity (3.1±0.03 points). The increase in sensory loads was associated with the use of information and communication tools during training, such as a computer, laptop, tablet, smartphone. Up to 15.3% of students during the traditional period and 35.5% of students during the distance education period used smartphones prohibited for teaching. The majority of students in the distance study form used a computer in 75.6% of cases, every third student (35.4%) used a laptop, with the traditional form of education, the proportion of students who used computers and laptops in teaching was 12.3–15.6%.

Limitations. The study on the assessment of the intensity of the educational process in various forms of education was limited by the fact that the sample was limited to primary school students, which does not allow extrapolating them to the total population of middle and senior level students. The timing of the intensity of educational activity in the lessons of mathematics and Russian language, which relate to difficult subjects, could determine a higher intensity of the educational process than if the assessment took into account all subjects. 

Conclusion. The obtained data especially emphasize the relevance of the adopted hygienic standards governing the total time of using information and communication tools both during the school day in the classroom and taking into account the entire time budget per day, and the need to control their use by students.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study was carried out in compliance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association in the current edition (WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects), including before the study, voluntary informed consent was obtained from the legal representatives of the students and approved by the local Ethics Committee at the FSBEI in the OrGMU of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Protocol No... from ... 2019).

Contribution:
Bulycheva E.V. — concept and design of research, collection and processing of material;
Antokhin E.Yu. — writing text, editing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: December 16, 2022 / Accepted: March 24, 2023 / Published: May 29, 2023

Авторлар туралы

Ekaterina Bulycheva

Orenburg State Medical University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: e-sosnina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8215-8674

MD, PhD, assistant professor of preventative medicine department. Orenburg State Medical University, Orenburg, 460000, Russian Federation.

e-mail: e-sosnina@mail.ru

Ресей

Evgeny Antokhin

Orenburg State Medical University

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6835-8613
Ресей

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Koroleva D.O. Always online: using mobile technology and social media at home and at school by modern teenagers. Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2016; (1): 205–24. (in Russian)
  2. Bukhtiyarov I.V, Denisov E.I., Eremin A.L. Bases of information hygiene: concepts and problems of innovations. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2014; 93(4): 5–9. (in Russian)
  3. Kuchma V.R. Declaration on hygienic safety for children and adolescents of the digital environment. Voprosy shkol’noy i universitetskoy meditsiny. 2014; (3): 62–3. (in Russian)
  4. Kuchma V.R., Sukhareva L.M., Khramtsov P.I. Hygienic safety children in hyperinformation society. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2016; (8): 4–7. (in Russian)
  5. Bol’shakov A.M., Krut’ko V.N., Kutepov E.N., Mamikonova O.A., Potemkina N.S., Rozenblit S.I., et al. Informational hygiene as a new topical branch of hygiene of children and adolescents. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2016; 95(2): 172–7. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2016-95-2-172-177 (in Russian)
  6. San’kov S.V. Hygienic security of the electronic information-educational environment in modern schools (scientific review). Voprosy shkol’noy i universitetskoy meditsiny i zdorov’ya. 2018; (2): 13–20. (in Russian)
  7. Kuchma V.R., Teksheva L.M., Kurganskiy A.M., Petrenko A.O. Petrenko hygienic assessment of the use of readers in elementary school. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2014; 93(3): 57–60. (in Russian)
  8. Kuchma V.R., Sukhareva L.M., Khramtsov P.I. Modern approaches to the support of the hygiene safety of children’s life in hyperinformational society. Voprosy shkol’noy i universitetskoy meditsiny i zdorov’ya. 2015; (3): 22–7. (in Russian)
  9. Kuchma V.R., Rapoport I.K., Sokolova S.B., Aleksandrova I.E., Makarova A.Yu., Mustafaeva K.Sh., et al. The prevalence and evaluation of electronics incorporated into the educational and recreational activity of schoolchildren of 7–8 classes. Sechenovskiy vestnik. 2015; (3): 43–50. (in Russian)
  10. Yanushanets O.I., Petrova N.A., Bezzubenkova E.F., Nelyubova E.A., Shirokova A.Yu. Hygienic assessment of technical equipment for the implementation of information technologies used in teaching schoolchildren. In: Preventive Medicine – 2019: Collection of Scientific Papers of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation [Profilakticheskaya meditsina – 2019: sbornik nauchnykh trudov Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem]. St. Petersburg; 2019: 244–50. (in Russian)
  11. Milushkina O.Yu., Popov V.I., Skoblina N.A., Markelova S.V., Sokolova N.V. The use of electronic devices by students, parents and teachers before and after the transition to distance learning. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2020; (3): 77–82. https://doi.org/10.24075/brsmu.2020.037 (in Russian)
  12. SanPiN 1.2.3685–21. Hygienic standards and requirements for ensuring the safety and (or) harmlessness of environmental factors for humans. Moscow; 2021. (in Russian)
  13. Aleksandrova I.E. Hygienic optimization of educational process at school involving massive use of electronic learning devices. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2020; (2): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2020.2.05 (in Russian)
  14. Efimova N.V., Myl’nikova I.V., Barsem M.P., Nekhurova S.B. Methodical support of hygienic assessment of school disciplines. Voprosy shkol’noy i universitetskoy meditsiny i zdorov’ya. 2016: (1): 36–40. (in Russian)
  15. Kuchma V.R., Efimova N.V., Tkachuk E.A., Myl’nikova I.V. Hygienic assessment of the overwroughtness of educational activity in schoolchildren of 5–10 classes of secondary schools. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2016; 95(6): 552–8. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-99002016-95-6-552-558 (in Russian)
  16. Mikheeva E.V., Novikova I.I., Erofeev Yu.V. Hygienic assessment of conditions of upbringing and education of schoolchildren in the modern context. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2011; (9): 37–40. (in Russian)
  17. Gavryushin M.Yu., Frolova O.V. Sanitary-hygienic characteristics of the learning environment of contemporary students. Mediko-farmatsevticheskiy zhurnal «Pul’s». 2017; 19(7): 76–80. (in Russian)
  18. The focus is on the health and well-being of adolescents. The results of the study “Health Behavior of school-age children” (HBSC) 2017/2018 in Europe and Canada. International report. The main results. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2020.
  19. McCarty C.A., Rhew I.C., Murowchick E., McCauley E., Vander Stoep A. Emotional health predictors of substance use initiation during middle school. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2012; 26(2): 351–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025630
  20. Guo H., Yang W., Cao Y., Li J., Siegrist J. Effort–reward imbalance at school and depressive symptoms in Chinese adolescents: the role of family socioeconomic status. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2014; 11(6): 6085–98. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110606085
  21. Joyce H.D., Early T.J. The impact of school connectedness and teacher support on depressive symptoms in adolescents: a multilevel analysis. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 2014; 39: 101–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.02.005
  22. Vogel M., Rees C.E., McCuddy T., Carson D.C. The highs that bind: school context, social status and marijuana use. J. Youth Adolesc. 2015; 44(5): 1153–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0254-8
  23. Ivanova N.V., Kalyulina V.A., Minaeva E.V. Effective tools and techniques of formation of cognitive interest at younger school students. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2017; (6): 70–3. (in Russian)
  24. Briko N.I., Kuchma V.R., Shubochkina E.I. Infectious morbidity in children and adolescents and the sanitary-and-epidemiological wellbeing of educational establishments. Rossiyskiy pediatricheskiy zhurnal. 2012; (2): 40–4. (in Russian)
  25. Bogomolova E.S., Shaposhnikova M.V., Kotova N.V. Sanitary well-being and health of schoolchildren in schools with different intensity of the educational process. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2014; (11): 20–3. (in Russian)
  26. Valina S.L., Shtina I.E., Osheva L.V., Ustinova O.Yu., Eysfel’d D.A. Hygienic assessment of the educational process in schools with different educational programs. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2019; 98(2): 166–70. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2019-98-2-166-170 (in Russian)
  27. Belousova M.V., Karpov A.M., Utkuzova M.A., Prusakov V.F., Ostudina A.A. Mental health of schoolchildren today: recognition of threats and prospects of their elimination. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2019; 17(5): 16–21. (in Russian)
  28. Antokhin E.Yu., Budza V.G., Antokhina R.I., Epanchintseva G.A. Psychophysiological assessment of adolescents who have committed a suicidal attempt. Orenburgskiy meditsinskiy vestnik. 2020; 8(2): 51–7. (in Russian)
  29. Lyubov E.B., Antokhin E.Yu., Palaeva R.I. A comment two-faced web: Werther vs Papageno. Suitsidologiya. 2016; 7(4): 41–51. (in Russian)
  30. Korolenko A.V., Gordievskaya A.N. Human Potential of the Child Population: Understanding and Assessment. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo. 2018; 17(5): 3. https://doi.org/10.15838/sa.2018.5.17.3 (in Russian)
  31. Shabunova A.A., Korolenko A.V. Children’s involvement in digital space: gadgetization trends and threats to human development. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2019; 3(4): 430–43. https://doi.org/10.35634/2587-9030-2019-3-4-430-443 (in Russian)
  32. Druzhilov S.A. Hygienic aspects of the information and technological person’s addiction in the new reality. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2019; 98(7): 748–53. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2019-98-7-748-753 (in Russian)
  33. Fil’kina O.M., Vorob’eva E.A., Dolotova N.V., Kocherova O.Yu., Malyshkina O.I. Long use of digital devices as a risk factor that causes myopia occurrence in schoolchildren. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2020; (4): 76–83. (in Russian)
  34. Ravichandran P., De Bravo B.F., Beauport R. Young children and screen time (TV, Computers, etc.). Washington: National Center for Health Research; 2019: 223–400.
  35. Peng M., Chen X., Zhao Q., Zhou Z. Attentional scope is reduced by Internet use: a behavior and ERP study. PLoS One. 2018; 13(6): e0198543. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198543
  36. Moisala M., Salmela V., Hietajärvi L., Salo E., Carlson S., Salonen O., et al. Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young. Neuroimage. 2016; 134: 113–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.011
  37. Hadar A., Hadas I., Lazarovits A., Alyagon U., Eliraz D., Zangen A. Answering the missed call: Initial exploration of cognitive and electrophysiological changes associated with smartphone use and abuse. PloS One. 2017; 12(7): e0180094. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180094
  38. Takeuchi H., Taki Y., Asano K., Asano M., Sassa Y., Yokota S., et al. Impact of frequency of internet use on development of brain structures and verbal intelligence: longitudinal analyses. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2018; 39(11): 4471–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24286
  39. Zubarev Yu.B. Mobile Phone and Health: Monograph [Mobil’nyy telefon i zdorov’e: monografiya]. Moscow: Biblio-Globus; 2019. (in Russian)

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Bulycheva E.V., Antokhin E.Y., 2024



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.