Antifouling coatings for electrochemical sensors

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Electrochemical sensors are extremely promising for the analysis of a number of organic and inorganic compounds both in biological fluids and natural waters during environmental monitoring due to easing operation, ease of miniaturization, low cost, low limits of analyte determination and the possibility of modifying electrodes with a wide range of organic and inorganic compounds and nanomaterials. One of the main problems limiting the use of electrochemical sensors is electrode fouling. The main way to solve this problem is antifouling coatings. Depending on the application, various additional requirements are imposed on the antifouling coatings, such as, for example, biocompatibility or mechanical strength. In this review, various types of antifouling coatings for sensors are considered, the main areas of application of certain coatings are indicated. The main emphasis is placed on non-biocidal coatings, as the most promising ones.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

N. Pavlova

All-Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: crx-pavlova@rambler.ru
Rússia, 125315, Moscow

R. Mardanov

All-Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: crx-pavlova@rambler.ru
Rússia, 125315, Moscow

O. Bubelo

All-Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: crx-pavlova@rambler.ru
Rússia, 125315, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Будников Г.К., Майстренко В.Н., Вяселев М.Р. Основы современного электрохимического анализа. М.: Мир: Бином Л3, 2003. 592 с.
  2. Baranwal J., Barse B., Gatto G., Broncova G., Kumar A. // Chemosensors. 2022. V. 10. № 9. P. 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10090363
  3. Zhou L., Li X., Zhu B., Su B. // Electroanalysis. 2022. V. 34. № 6. P. 966–975. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.202100406
  4. Figueroa-Miranda G., Wu C., Zhang Y., Nörbelet L., Lo Y., Tanner J.A., Elling L., Offenhäusser A., Mayer D. // Bioelectrochemistry. 2020. V. 136. 107589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2020.107589
  5. Lu H., He B., Gao B. // Eng. Regeneration. 2021. V. 2. P. 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2021.12.002
  6. Han R., Wang G., Xu Z., Zhang L., Li Q., Han Y., Luo X. // Biosen. Bioelectron. 2020. V. 164. 112317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112317
  7. Caratelli V., Ciampaglia A., Guiducci J., Guiducci J., Sancesario G., Moscone D., Arduini F. // Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020. V. 165. 112411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112411
  8. Lakard S., Pavel I.-A., Lakard B. // Biosensors. 2021. V. 11. № 6. 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11060179
  9. Puthongkham P., Venton B.J. // ACS Sensors. 2019. V. 4. № 9. P. 2403–2411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b00994
  10. Vadgama P. // Sensors. 2020. V. 20. № 11. 3149. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113149
  11. Campuzano S., Pedrero M., Yáñez-Sedeño P., Pingarrón J.M. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019. V. 20. № 2. 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020423
  12. Qui H., Feng K., Gapeeva A., Meurisch K., Kaps S., Li X., Yu L., Mishra Y.K., Adelung R., Baum M. // Prog. Polym. Sci. 2022. V. 127. 101516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.101516
  13. Bauer M., Duerkop A., Baeumner A.J. // Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2023. V. 415. P. 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04363-2
  14. Jin H., Tian L., Bing W., Zhao J., Ren L. // Prog. Mater. Sci., 2022, V. 124, 100889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100889
  15. Piehler J., Brecht A., Valiokas R., Liedberg B., Gauglitz G. // Biosens. Bioelectron. 2000. V. 15. № 9–10. P. 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03756
  16. M. Li, Jiang Sh., Simon J., Paßlick D., Frey M.-L., Wagner M., Mailänder V., Crespy D., Landfester K. // Nano Lett. 2021. V. 21. № 4. P. 1591–1598. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03756
  17. Yang W., Zhou F. // Biosurface and Biotribology. 2017. V. 3. № 3. P. 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsbt.2017.10.001
  18. Choi Y., Tran H.-V., Lee T.R. // Coatings. 2022. V. 12. № 10. 1462. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101462
  19. Jiménez-Pardo I., Van der Ven L.G.J., Van Benthem R.A.T.M., De With G., Esteves A.C.C. // Coatings. 2018. V. 8. № 5. 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8050184
  20. Wu J.-G., Chen J.-H., Liu K.-T., Luo S.-C. // Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019. V. 11. № 24. P. 21294–21307. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b04924
  21. Delgado A., Briciu-Burghina C., Regan F. // Sensors, 2021. V. 21. № 2. 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020389
  22. Nien P.-C., Tung T.-S., Ho K.-C. // Electroanalysis. 2006. V. 18. № 13–14. P. 1408–1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.200603552
  23. Gao N., Yu J., Tian Q., Shi J., Zhang M., Chen Sh., Zang L. // Chemosensors. 2021. V. 9. № 4. 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors9040079
  24. Hsu C.-C., Liu T.-Y., Peng X.-Y., Cheng Y.-W., Lin Y.-R., Yang M.-C., Huang L.-Y., Liu K.-H., Yung M.-C. // Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020. V. 397. № 15. 125963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125963
  25. Benoudjit A., Bader M.M., Salim W.W.A.W. // Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2018. V. 17. P. 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2018.01.001
  26. Yang X., Chen P., Zhang Xi, Zhou H., Song Z., Yang W., Luo X. // Anal. Chim. Acta. 2023. V. 1252. 341075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2023.341075
  27. Singha P., Locklin J., Handa H. // Acta Biomater. 2017. V. 50. P. 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.070
  28. Lin C.-H., Luo S.-C. // Langmuir. 2022. V. 38. № 24. P. 7383–7399. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00448
  29. Chen X., Noy A. // APL Mater. 2021. V. 9. № 2. 020701. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0029994
  30. Chen S., Li L., Zheng J. // Polymer. 2010. V. 51. V. 23. P. 5283–5293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.022
  31. Regev C., Jiang Z., Kasher R., Miller Y. // Molecules, 2022. V. 27. № 21. 7394. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217394
  32. Jayakumar K., Lielpetere A. Domingo-Lopez D.A., Levey R.E., Duffy G.P., Schuhmann W., Leech D. // Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023. V. 219. 114815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2022.114815
  33. Klukova L., Bertok T., Petrikova M., Sediva A., Mislovicova D., Katrlik J., Vikartovska A., Filip J., Kasak P., Andicsová-Eckstein A., Mosnáček J., Lukáč J., Rovenský J., Imrich R., Tkac J. // Anal. Chim. Acta. 2015. V. 853. P. 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.029
  34. Bertok T., Klukova L., Sediva A., Kasák P., Semak V., Micusik M., Omastova M., Chovanová L., Vlček M., Imrich R., Vikartovska A., Tkac J. // Anal. Chem. 2013. V. 85. № 15. P. 7324–7332. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac401281t
  35. Bertok T., Dosekova E., Belicky S., Holazova A., Lorencova L., Mislovicova D., Paprckova D., Vikartovska A., Plicka R., Krejci J., Ilcikova M., Kasak P., Tkac J. // Langmuir. 2016. V. 32. № 28. P. 7070–7078. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01456
  36. Tan D., Li F., Zhou B. Int. J. // Electrochem. Sci. 2020. V. 15. № 9. P. 9446–9458. https://doi.org/10.20964/2020.09.56
  37. Li Y., Zhao S., Xu Z., Qiao X., Li M., Li Y., Luo X. // Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023. V. 225. 115101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2023.115101
  38. Chungprempree J., Preechawong J., Nithitanakul M. // Polymers. 2022. V. 14. № 20. 4252. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14204252
  39. Janczarek M., Hupka J., Kisch H. // Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2006. V. 40. P. 287–292.
  40. Chen Y., Liu B., Chen Z., Zuo X. // Anal. Chem. 2021. V. 93. № 30. P. 10635–10643. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01973
  41. Patel J., Zhao B., Uppalapati B., Daniels R.C., Ward K.R., Collinson M.M. // Anal. Chem. 2013. V. 85. № 23. P. 11610–11618. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac403013r
  42. Matharu Z., Daggumati P., Wang L., Dorofeeva T.S., Li Z., Seker E. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017. V. 9. № 15. P. 12959–12966. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b15212
  43. Summerlot D., Kumar A., Das S., Goldstein L., Seal S., Diaz D., Cho H.J. // Procedia Engineering. 2011. V. 25. P. 1457–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.360
  44. Chu Y., Zhou H., Wang X., Zhang H., Zhao L., Xu T., Yan H., Zhao F. // Microchem. J. 2023. V. 186. 108259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2022.108259
  45. Guo J., Liu X., Wang A., Yu X., Ding L. // Microchem. J. 2022. V. 183. 107964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2022.107964
  46. Goux A., Etienne M., Aubert E., Lecomte C., Ghanbaja J., Walcariusn A. // Chem. Mater. 2009. V. 21. № 4. P. 731–741. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm8029664
  47. Walcariu A., Sibottier E., Etienne M., Ghanbaja J. // Nat. Mater. 2007. V. 6. № 8. P. 602–608. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1951
  48. Huang J., Zhang T., Dong G., Zhu S., Yan F., Liu J. // Front. Chem. 2022. V. 10. 900282. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffchem.2022.900282
  49. Huang J., Zhang T., Dong G., Zhu S., Yan F., Liu J. // Front. Chem., Sec. Analytical Chemistry. –2022. – Volume 10, 900282. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffchem.2022.900282
  50. Verger L., Xu C., Natu V., Cheng H.-M., Ren W., Barsoum M.W. // Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2019. V. 23. № 3. P. 149–163.
  51. Babar Z.U.D., Ventura B.D., Velotta R., Iannotti V. // RSC Adv. 2022. V. 12. P. 19590–19610. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA02985E
  52. Сметкин А.В., Майорова Ю.К. Вестник ПНИПУ. Машиностроение, материаловедение. 2015. Т. 17. № 4. С. 120–138. https://doi.org/10.15593/2224–9877/2015.4.09
  53. Singh C., Höfs S., Konthur Z., Hodoroaba V.-D., Radnik J., Schenk J.A., Schneider R.J. // ACS Appl. Eng. Mater. 2023. V. 1. P. 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaenm.2c00118
  54. Lorencova L., Sadasivuni K.K., Kasak P., Tkac J. Ti3C2 MXene-Based Nanobiosensors for Detection of Cancer Biomarkers. In: Novel Nanomaterials. Krishnamoorthy K. (ed.). IntechOpen, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94309
  55. Yu R., Xue J., Wang Y., Qiu J., Huang X., Chen A., Xue J.J. // Nanobiotechnol. 2022. V. 20. 119. https://doi.org/10.1186%2Fs12951-022-01317-9
  56. Krishnamoorthy R., Muthumalai K., Nagaraja T., Rajendrakumar R.T., Das S.R. // ACS Omega. 2022. V. 10. V. 7. № 46. P. 42644–42654. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06505
  57. Wu L., Lu X., Dhanjai, Wu Z.-S., Dong Y., Wan X., Zheng S., Chene J. // Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018. V. 107. P. 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.02.021
  58. Rhouati A., Berkani M., Vasseghian Y., Golzadeh N. // Chemosphere. 2022. V. 291. 132921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132921
  59. Cheng H., Yang J. // Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020. V. 15. V. 3. P. 2295–2306. https://doi.org/10.20964/2020.03.24
  60. Yang M., Wang L., Lu H., Dong Q. // Micromachines, 2023. V. 14. № 5. 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14051088
  61. Mehmandoust M., Li. G., Erk N. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023. V. 62. V. 11. P. 4628–4635. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c03058
  62. Kanoun O., Lazarević-Pašti T., Pašti I., Nasraoui S., Talbi M., Brahem A., Adiraju A., Sheremet E., Rodriguez R.D., Ali M.B., Al-Hamry A. // Sensors. 2021. V. 21. № 12. 4131. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124131
  63. Peltola E., Sainio S., Holt K.B., Palomäki T., Koskinen J., Laurila T. // Anal. Chem. 2018. V. 90. № 2. P. 1408–1416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04793
  64. Medyantseva E.P., Gazizullina E.R., Brusnitsyn D.V., Ziganshin M.A., Mustafina A.R., Elistratova J.G., Brylev K.A., Budnikov H.C. // Anal. Lett. 2022. V. 55. № 11. P. 1757–1770. https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2021.2025384
  65. Zahran M., Khalifa Z., Zahrana M.A.-H., Azzema M.A. // Mater. Adv. 2021. V. 2. P. 7350–7365. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1MA00769F
  66. Ren J., Han P., Wei H., Jia L. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014. V. 6. № 6. P. 3829–3838. https://doi.org/10.1021/am500292y
  67. Ensafi A.A., Zandi-Atashbar N., Rezaei B., Ghiaci M., Chermahinia M.E., Moshiri P. // RSC Adv. 2016. V. 6. P. 60926–60932. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA10698F
  68. Lotfi Z., Gholivand M.B., Shamsipur M., Mahin mirzaei // J. Alloys Compd. 2022. V. 903. 163912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163912
  69. Bek F., Loessl M., Baeumner A.J. // Microchim. Acta. 2023. V. 190. 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604–023–05666–6
  70. Yu T., Glennon L., Fenelon O., Breslin C.B. // Talanta. 2023. V. 251. 123758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123758

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. Scheme of formation of a hydration layer on hydrophilic polymers (a), polymers with zwitter ions (b) and self-assembling layers (c) [29].

Baixar (173KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 2. The scheme of modification of the electrode with mesoporous silica. GCE is a glassy carbon electrode, GO is graphene oxide, MSF is a mesoporous silica film, SM are micelles of surfactant. The author's drawing is based on the data of the work [45].

Baixar (211KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024