<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Физиотерапия, бальнеология и реабилитация</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1681-3456</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2413-2969</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">41598</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18821/1681-3456-2016-15-1-43-48</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The use of the knee joint replacement prosthesis after the amputation at the level between hip and knee</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Протез коленного сустава при ампутации на уровне бедра</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Prokopenko</surname><given-names>R. A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Прокопенко</surname><given-names>Роман Александрович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>raprokopenko@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Public joint-stock company “I.S. Bruk Institute of Electronic Controlling Machines”</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ПАО «Институт электронных управляющих машин им. И.С. Брука»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2016-02-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 15, NO1 (2016)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 15, №1 (2016)</issue-title><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-07-23"><day>23</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2016, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2016, ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://rjpbr.com/1681-3456/article/view/41598">https://rjpbr.com/1681-3456/article/view/41598</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This review was designed to characterize the current state-of-the-art of knee joint replacement prosthetics with respect to the cases of the amputation at the level between hip and knee. Various types of knee joint modules are compared. The clinical and biomechanical methods are described that are employed to evaluate the effectiveness of the movements of the disabled patients following the amputation at the level between hip and knee.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В обзоре охарактеризовано современное состояние области протезирования коленного сустава при ампутации на уровне бедра. Проведено сравнение различных типов коленных модулей. Описаны клинические и биомеханические методы оценки эффективности движений инвалидов с ампутациями нижней конечности.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>lower extremity amputation</kwd><kwd>knee joint replacement prosthesis</kwd><kwd>biomechanics of walking</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>ампутация нижней конечности</kwd><kwd>протез кояенного сустава</kwd><kwd>биомеханика походки</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Питкин М.Р. Теория построения и практика синтеза антропоморфных протезов нижней конечности: Дис. ... д-ра техн. наук. СПб.; 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Ziegler-Graham K., MacKenzie E.J., Ephraim P.L., Travison T.G., Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2008; 89(3): 422-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Torres M. Incidence and causes of limb amputations. Phys. Med. Rehabil.: State Art Rev. 1994; 8: 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organisation; 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Theeven P.J., Hemmen B., Brink P.R., Smeets R.J., Seelen H.A. Measures and procedures utilized to determine the added value of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2013; 14(1): 333.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>HCFA Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS). Springfield (VA): U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Gailey R.S., Roach K.E., Applegate E.B., Cho B., Cunniffe B., Licht S. et al. The amputee mobility predictor: An instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee’s ability to ambulate. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2002; 83(5): 613-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Driver T.A. Innovation for Powered Prostheses Utilizing Pneumatic Actuators: PhD Thesis. Tuscaloosa, Alabama; 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Sup F.C. IV. A Powered Self-contained Knee and Ankle Prosthesis for Near Normal Gait in Transfemoral Amputees: PhD Thesis. Nashville, Tennessee; 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Lambrecht B.G.A. Design of a Hybrid Passive-active Prosthesis for Above-knee Amputees: PhD Thesis. Berkeley; 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Borjian R. Design, Modeling, and Control of an Active Prosthetic Knee: PhD Thesis. Waterloo, Ontaroi, Canada; 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Alcaide-Aguirre R.E., Morgenroth D.C., Ferris D.P. Motor control and learning with lower-limb myoelectric control in amputees. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2013; 50(5): 687.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Hargrove L.J., Simon A.M., Lipschutz R., Finucane S.B., Kuiken T.A. Non-weight-bearing neural control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis. J. NeuroEngineer. Rehabil. 2013; 10(1): 62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Hargrove L.J., Simon A.M., Young A.J., Lipschutz R.D., Finucane S.B., Smith D.G., Kuiken T.A. Robotic leg control with EMG decoding in an amputee with nerve transfers. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013; 369(13): 1237-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Clippinger F.W., Seaber A.V., McElhaney J.H., Harrelson J.M., Maxwell G.M. Afferent sensory feedback for lower extremity prosthesis. Clin. Orthop. 1982; 169: 202-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Webb G. Real-time Electro-tactile Biofeedback for Amputee Gait ReTraining: PhD Thesis. Guildford, Surrey; 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Sup F., Bohara A., Goldfarb M. Design and control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2008; 27(2): 263-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Hogan N. Impedance control: An approach to manipulation. J. Dynamic. Syst. Measur., Control. 1985; 107: 1-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Фарбер Б.С., Витензон А.С., Морейнис И.Ш. Теоретические основы построения протезов нижних конечностей и коррекции движения. М.: ЦНИИПП; 1994; т. 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Aghasadeghi N., Zhao J/, Hargrove L.J., Ames A.D., Perreault E.J., Bretl T. Learning impedance controller parameters for lower-limb prostheses. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Tokyo; 2013: 4268-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Akbari M., Farahmand F., Abu Osman N.A., Zohoor H. A robotic model of transfemoral amputee locomotion for design optimization of knee controllers. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2013; 10: 161.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Pejhan S., Farahmand F., Parnianpour M. Design optimization of an above-knee prosthesis based on the kinematics of gait. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2008. 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. Vancouver; 2008: 4274-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Sinnet R.W., Zhao H., Shah R.P., Ames A.D. Simulating prosthetic devices with human-inspired hybrid control. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. San Francisco; 2011: 1723-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Zhao Jie, Berns K., de Souza Baptista R., Bo A.P.L. Design of variabledamping control for prosthetic knee based on a simulated biped. In: The Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2013 IEEE International Conference. Seattle, WA; 2013: 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Zhao J., Berns K., Baptista R.D.S., Bo A., Luksch T. A comparison of a passive and variable-damping controlled leg prosthesis in a simulated environment. In: 16th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots CLAWAR. Sydney; 2013:</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Tanawongsuwan R., Bobick A. Performance analysis of time-distance gait parameters under different speeds. In: Audio-and Video-based Biometric Person Authentication. Guidlford, UK; 2003: 715-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Kaufman K.R., Frittoli S., Frigo C.A. Gait asymmetry of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. Clin. Biomech. 2012; 27(5): 460-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Скворцов Д.В. Клинический анализ движений. Анализ походки. Иваново: Стимул; 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Рукина Н.Н., Кузнецов А.Н., Белова А.Н., Воробьева О.В. Особенности биомеханических характеристик опороспособности и походки у пациентов с экзопротезом нижней конечности. Российский журнал биомеханики. 2014; 18(3): 389-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>van der Linde H., Hofstad C.J., Geurts A.C., Postema K., Geertzen J.H., van Limbeek J. A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2004; 41(4): 555-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Franchignoni F., Giordano A., Ferriero G., Orlandini D., Amoresano A., Perucca L. Measuring mobility in people with lower limb amputation: Rasch analysis of the mobility section of the prosthesis evaluation questionnaire. J. Rehabil. Med. 2007; 39(2): 138-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Legro M.W., Reiber G.D., Smith D.G. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1998; 79: 931-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Legro M.W., Reiber G.E., Smith D.G. A Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ). In: The Association for Health Services Research 14th Annual Meeting, Chicago. June 15-17, 1997. ...; 1997:</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Larsson B., Johannesson A., Andersson I.H., Atroshi I. The Locomotor Capabilities Index; validity and reliability of the Swedish version in patients with lower limb amputation.”Hlth Qual. Life Outcomes. 2009; 7(1): 44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Grisé M.C., Gauthier-Gagnon C., Martineau G.G. Prosthetic profile of people with lower extremity amputation: conception and design of a follow-up questionnaire. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1993; 74(8): 862-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Ryall N.H., Eyres S.B., Neumann V.C., Bhakta B.B., Tennant A. The SIGAM mobility grades: a new population-specific measure for lower limb amputees. Disabil. Rehabil. 2003; 25(15): 833-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Hagberg K., Brånemark R., Hägg O. Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA): initial validity and reliability of a new outcome measure. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2004; 41(5): 695-706.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Theeven P., Hemmen B., Stevens C., Ilmer E., Brink P., Seelen H. Feasibility of a new concept for measuring actual functional performance in daily life of transfemoral amputees. J. Rehabil. Med. 2010; 42(8): 744-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Kark L., McIntosh A.S., Simmons S. The use of the 6-min walk test as a proxy for the assessment of energy expenditure during gait in individuals with lower-limb amputation. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 2011; 34(3): 227-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Frlan-Vrgoc L., Vrbanić T.S.-L., Kraguljac D., Kovacević M. Functional outcome assessment of lower limb amputees and prosthetic users with a 2-minute walk test. Coll. Antropol. 2011; 35(4): 1215-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>van Eijk M.S., van der Linde H., Buijck B., Geurts A., Zuidema S., Koopmans R. Predicting prosthetic use in elderly patients after major lower limb amputation. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 2012; 36(1): 45-52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Bowden M.G., Behrman A.L. Step activity monitor: accuracy and testretest reliability in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2007; 44(3): 355-62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Winter D.A. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley; 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Perry J. Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological function. 2nd Ed. Thorofare, N.J.: SLACK; 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Weir R.F., Troyk P.R., DeMichele G.A., Kerns D.A., Schorsch J.F., Maas H. Implantable myoelectric sensors (IMESs) for intramuscular electromyogram recording. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2009; 56(1): 159-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>He Huang, Fan Zhang, Hargrove L.J., Zhi Dou, Rogers D.R., Englehart K.B. Continuous locomotion-mode identification for prosthetic legs based on neuromuscular-mechanical fusion. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2011; 58(10): 2867-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Lin Du, Fan Zhang, Ming Liu, He Huang. Toward design of an environment-aware adaptive locomotion-mode-recognition system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2012; 59(10): 2716-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Inoue K., Wada T., Harada R., Tachiwana S. Novel knee joint mechanism of transfemoral prosthesis for stair ascent. In: The Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2013 IEEE International Conference. Seattle, WA; 2013: 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Unal R., Carloni R., Hekman E.E., Stramigioli S., Koopman H. Conceptual design of an energy efficient transfemoral prosthesis. In: Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference. Taipei; 2010: 343-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Unal R., Klijnstra F., Burkink B., Behrens S.M., Hekman E.E., Stramigioli S. et al. Modeling of WalkMECH: A fully-passive energy-efficient transfemoral prosthesis prototype. In: IEEE... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics: [Proceedings]. Soattb, WA; 2013: 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Bellmann M., Schmalz T., Ludwigs E., Blumentritt S. Stair ascent with an innovative microprocessor-controlled exoprosthetic knee joint. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.). 2012; 57(6): 435-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Highsmith M.J., Kahle J.T., Lura D.J., Lewandowski A.L., Quillen W.S., Kim S.H. Stair ascent and ramp gait training with the genium knee. Technol. Innov. 2014; 15(4): 349-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Vucina A. Kinematics and forces in the above-knee prosthesis during the stair climbing. Int. J. Simul. Model. 2005; 4(1): 17-26.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
