The efficacy and safety repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of migraine in children and adolescents: an open-label, single-arm, prospective, clinical trial
- Authors: Borodulina I.V.1,2, Gerasimenko M.Y.1,3, Pavlova S.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
- Children’s City Polyclinic No. 39, Moscow
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Issue: Vol 25, No 3 (2026)
- Pages: 224-235
- Section: Original studies
- Published: 30.06.2026
- URL: https://rjpbr.com/1681-3456/article/view/704161
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/rjpbr704161
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WYCOGR
- ID: 704161
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The article presents the results of a clinical study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in children with migraine.
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rTMS in children with migraine.
METHODS: A open-label, single-arm, prospective cohort clinical study was conducted in 41 pediatric patients with migraine (mean age 12.34 ± 3.42 years) at Children’s City Polyclinic No. 39 in Moscow. In stage 1, we used rTMS of the left primary motor cortex at 70% of the motor threshold, 10 Hz (6-sec train, 45-sec inter-train interval), 600 stimuli per session, 3 sessions. If efficacy parameters were not achieved within one month (≥50% reduction in pain intensity and/or ≥30% reduction in the number of monthly headache episodes), patients were transferred to stage 2 with the following parameters: 10 daily sessions (excluding weekends) , 10 Hz, 70% of the motor threshold, 4-sec train, 11-sec inter-train interval , and 3000 stimuli per session. Efficacy was assessed based on changes in headache diary parameters, questionnaire scores, and instrumental findings.
RESULTS: In stage 1, 21.9% of patients achieved the efficacy criteria. In stage 2, positive changes were observed in headache intensity and frequency (p < 0.001): 28% of patients had a ≥50% reduction in pain intensity; 100% of patients had a ≥30% reduction in headache frequency. The HADS depression subscale score decreased by 41.7% (p < 0.001); the Spielberger–Hanin anxiety scale score decreased by 5.8 points for trait anxiety and by 7.6 points for state anxiety (p < 0.001); positive changes were observed on the CPAQ-R (5.2%, p = 0.003), and PedsQL (11.9%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: rTMS of the left primary motor cortex significantly reduces the number of episodes and intensity of migraine headaches in children, reduces symptoms of anxiety and depression, positively affects quality of life and functional nervous system parameters, and is characterized by a favorable safety profile and good tolerability. Increasing the number of stimuli and sessions improves efficacy and increases the proportion of patients with a successful outcome.
Full Text
About the authors
Irina V. Borodulina
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Children’s City Polyclinic No. 39, Moscow
Author for correspondence.
Email: irina.borodulina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7526-1553
SPIN-code: 2152-5737
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowMarina Yu. Gerasimenko
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: mgerasimenko@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1741-7246
SPIN-code: 7625-6452
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowSvetlana V. Pavlova
Children’s City Polyclinic No. 39, Moscow
Email: pavlovasv@zdrav.mos.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5188-3796
SPIN-code: 8300-9342
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Sundblad G, Saartok T, Engström L. Prevalence and co-occurrence of selfrated pain and perceived health in school children: аge and gender differences. European Journal of Pain. 2007;11(2):171–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.02.006
- Sergeev AV, Ekusheva EV. Migraine in children. Diagnostics features and modern possibilities of therapy. RMJ. Medical Review. 2018;2(9):28–32 (In Russ.) EDN: YQJOIH
- Abu-Arafeh I, Morozova M. Migraine in children and adolescents: Assessment and diagnosis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2024;199:475–485. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823357-3.00029-X
- Victor TW, Hu X, Campbell JC, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Migraine prevalence by age and sex in the United States: a life-span study. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(9):1065–72. doi: 10.1177/0333102409355601
- Azimova YuE, Amelin AV, Alferova VV, et al. Clinical guidelines “Migraine”. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2022;122(1–3):4–36. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20221220134 EDN: HHGQYC
- The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3). Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211.
- Khan J, Asoom LIA, Sunni AA, et al. Genetics, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of migraine. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;139:111557. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111557
- Berdnikova AV, Kadymova NB, Latysheva NV, Filatova EG. Impact of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies on central sensitization level in migraine patients. Medical alphabet. 2023;(33):6–12. doi: 10.33667/2078-5631-2023-33-8-12 EDN: GNHIPW
- Lee LH, Olness KN. Clinical and demographic characteristics of migraine in urban children. Headache. 1997;37(5):269–76. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1997.3705269.x
- Arruda MA, Arruda R, Guidetti V, Bigal ME. Psychosocial adjustment of children with migraine and tension-type headache — a nationwide study. Headache. 2015;55(Suppl 1):39–50. doi: 10.1111/head.12510
- Izmaylova IG, Belopasov VV, Jumagaziev AA, Kostina LA. Prediction of chronic migraine in children and adolescents. Russian journal of pain. 2015;40(3–4):22–27. EDN: YLOYSN
- Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131(2):474–528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002
- Tsai YY, Wu WT, Han DS, Mezian K, et al. Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain: A Narrative Review. Life (Basel). 2023;13(2):258. doi: 10.3390/life13020258
- Borodulina IV, Badalov NG, Gushcha AO, Rachin A.P. Non-pharmacological technologies of medical rehabilitation in the treatment of patients with radicular pain syndrome. Russian journal of pain. 2018;2(56):248 (In Russ.) EDN: XODUZF
- Hosomi K, Kishima H, Oshino S, et al. Cortical excitability changes after high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for central poststroke pain. Pain. 2013;154(8):1352–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.017
- Kotova OV, Borodulina IV. Pain in children and adolescents. Clinical review for general practice. 2024;5(8):79–83. doi: 10.47407/kr2024.5.8.00463
- Fernandes AM, Graven-Nielsen T, de Andrade DC. New updates on transcranial magnetic stimulation in chronic pain. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2022;16(2):65–70. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000591
- Leung A, Shirvalkar P, Chen R, Kuluva J, et al.; Expert Consensus Panel. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Pain, Headache, and Comorbid Depression: INS-NANS Expert Consensus Panel Review and Recommendation. Neuromodulation. 2020;23(3):267–290. doi: 10.1111/ner.13094
- Zhong J, Lan W, Feng Y, Yu L, et al. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic migraine: A meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2022;13:1050090. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1050090
- Saltychev M, Juhola J. Effectiveness of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;101(11):1001–1006. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001953
- Calabrò RS, Billeri L, Manuli A, Iacono A, Naro A. Applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: evidence from a scoping review. J Integr Neurosci. 2022;21(4):110. doi: 10.31083/j.jin2104110
- Hansen JM, Baca SM, Vanvalkenburgh P, Charles A. Distinctive anatomical and physiological features of migraine aura revealed by 18 years of recording. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 12):3589–95. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt309
- Andreou AP, Holland PR, Akerman S, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and potential cortical and trigeminothalamic mechanisms in migraine. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 7):2002–14. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww118
- Zardouz S, Shi L, Leung A. A feasible repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation clinical protocol in migraine prevention. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2016;4:2050313X16675257. doi: 10.1177/2050313X16675257
- Borodulina IV, Gerasimenko MYu, Kotova OV, Pavlova SV, Zaytseva T.N. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Tension-Type Headache in Children and Adolescents: An Open-Label Prospective Clinical Study. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2026;25(1):40–52. doi: 10.38025/2078-1962-2026-25-1-40-52 EDN: FJUNMR
- Kalita J, Laskar S, Bhoi SK, Misra UK. Efficacy of single versus three sessions of high rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in chronic migraine and tension-type headache. J Neurol. 2016;263(11):2238–2246. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8257-2
- Varni JW, Thompson KL, Hanson V. The Varni/Thompson Pediatric Pain Questionnaire. I. Chronic musculoskeletal pain in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pain. 1987;28(1):27–38. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91056-6
- Denisova RV, Alekseyeva YeI, Al’bitskiy VYu, et al. Reliability, validity and sensitivity of russian versions of PedsQL Generic Core Scale and PedsQL Rheumatology Module Questionnaires. Current pediatrics (Moscow). 2009;8(1):30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.006 EDN: KGBOBR
- McCracken LM, Vowles KE, Eccleston C. Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain. 2004;107(1–2):159–66. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.012
- Mantrova IN. Methodological Guide on Psychophysiological and Psychological Diagnostics. Ivanovo; 2007. 216 p. (In Russ.)
- Akimova MK, Kozlova VT. Recommendations for Using the Results of Diagnostics of Natural Human Characteristics in Pedagogical Practice. Methods of Diagnostics of Natural Human Psychophysiological Characteristics. Moscow; 1992. Vol. 2: 99–110. (In Russ.)
- Ilyin EP, editor. Psychomotor Organization of a Human Being: Textbook for Universities. St. Petersburg: Peter; 2003. (In Russ.)
- Budukool LKC, Khovalygh AM, Sarygh SKO. Neurodynamic indicators by tapping-test of students of Tuvan state university. Vestnik Hakasskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.F. Katanova. 2013;(6):16–19. (In Russ.) EDN: SGMGCZ
- Spielberger CD. Test Anxiety Inventory: Preliminary professional manual. Menlo Park; 1980.
- Hanin YuL. Adaptation of Yu.L. Hanin’s method. A brief guide to the Spielberger’s scale of reactive and personal anxiety. Leningrad; 1976. 18 p. (In Russ.)
- Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
- Bakulin IS, Poydasheva AG, Lagoda DYu, et al. Safety and tolerability of different protocols of high-frequency rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation. Ulyanovsk medico-biological journal. 2019;(1):26–37. doi: 10.34014/ 2227-1848-2019-1-26-37 EDN: ZDFDKH
- Sereda AP, Andrianova MA. Study Design Guidelines. Traumatology and orthopedics of Russia. 2019;25(3):165–184. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-3-165-184
- von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. TROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806–808. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
- O’Reardon JP, Fontecha JF, Cristancho MA, Newman S. Unexpected reduction in migraine and psychogenic headaches following rTMS treatment for major depression: a report of two cases. CNS Spectr. 2007;12(12):921–5. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900015716
- Allen CH, Kluger BM, Buard I. Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Pediatr Neurol. 2017;68:3–17. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.12.009
Supplementary files


