Evolution of the UK Tilt to the Indo-Pacific Region

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article explores the conceptual foundations of the UK “tilt to the Indo-Pacific”, its evolution and the transformation of the strategic narrative ensued therefrom as it is impacted by a number of factors from both outside and within. The author notes that the flagship proposal of the Conservative cabinet for indivisible Euro-Atlantic and IndoPacific security is twofold: to extrapolate the principles of transatlantic security to the new region, and to present Britain in the emerging multipolarity in a new ambitious role as a link between two mega-spaces. It is highlighted the continuity of the foreign policy approach of the new Labor government, which, based on the conceptual framework of the Conservative cabinet, seeks to strengthen London’s position in the Indo-Pacific. It is shown that the strategy of the Conservative government in the Indo-Pacific is limited not only by resource scarcity but also by heated internal debates as to an ultimate goal of its presence in the region (the degree of involvement in the economic and defense ecosystem), as well as the nature of future relations with China. Moreover, London’s position is also weakened by the contradictory attitude of regional actors towards the UK’s role in the region, as well as broad inter-party discussions on adjusting the foreign policy strategy in the region.

作者简介

K. Godovanyuk

Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: kira.godovanyuk@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5205-0021

PhD (Political Science), Leading Researcher

Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Wilkins T. 2023. ‘Tilting’ the balance? An evaluation of Britain’s strategic approach to the Indo-Pacific. International Political Science Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121231195605
  2. Pearce N. 2023. ‘East of Suez’ and the ‘Indo-Pacific’ in British Politics: Some Lessons of History. International Journal. 78(3), Pp. 345–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020231195629
  3. Kharitonova E.M. 2022. Reconsidering the theme of empire in the United Kingdom’s current political rhetoric. Political science. № 1, Pp. 157–176. (In Russ.). DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2021.01.06
  4. Godovanyuk K.A. 2024. Foreign policy consensus against the backdrop of the UK election campaign. Analytical papers Institute of Europe of Russian Academy of Sciences. № 2 (38), Pp. 52–58. (In Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.15211/analytics21520245258
  5. Godovanyuk K.A. 2023. “Postcolonial Moment” in Foreign Policy Discourse: the Casus of “Global Britain”. Journal of International Analytics. № 14(2). Pp. 116–132. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-2-116-132
  6. Breslin S., Burnham P. 2023. International order transition and the UK’s tilt to the Indo-Pacific. The Pacific Review. Vol. 36, № 2, 406–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2160796
  7. Gromyko Al.A. (ed.) 2022. Europe in the Crisis World. Moscow. Pp. 22–47. (In Russ.)
  8. Nilsson-Wright J. 2023. UK Policy on the Indo-Pacific: Balancing Global Ambition in an Era of Resource Scarcity and Rising Insecurity. Asia Policy. Vol. 18, № 3. Pp. 82–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.a903866
  9. Nagata S. 2023. From Global Britain to Atlantic-Pacific: The United Kingdom’s Indo-Pacific Policy under the Integrated Review Refresh 2023. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs. Vol. 6, Iss. 5, Pp. 146–152.
  10. Gaskarth J. 2023. Strategy, Tactics and Tilts. A networked Approach to UK Influence in the Indo-Pacific. RUSI Journal. Pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1080/03071847.2022.2159515

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024