Heat Capacity And Thermal Expansion Of LaMgAl11O19

P. G. Gagarin; Гагарин П. Г.; A. V. Guskov; Гуськов А. В.; V. N. Guskov; Гуськов В. Н.; G. E. Nikiforova; Никифорова Г. Е.; K. S. Gavrcihev; Гавричев К. С.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X24060089

Heat Capacity And Thermal Expansion Of LaMgAl11O19

Авторлар: Gagarin P.G.¹, Guskov A.V.¹, Guskov V.N.¹, Nikiforova G.E.¹, Gavrcihev K.S.¹
Мекемелер:
1. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of RAS
Шығарылым: Том 69, № 6 (2024)
Беттер: 866-873
Бөлім: ФИЗИЧЕСКИЕ МЕТОДЫ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ
URL: https://rjpbr.com/0044-457X/article/view/666497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X24060089
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XTGLKG
ID: 666497

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық

Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық

Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация
Толық мәтін
Авторлар туралы
Әдебиет тізімі
Қосымша файлдар
Статистика

Аннотация

The heat capacity of LaMgAl11O19 with a magnetoplumbite structure was measured in the temperature range of 7–1865 K using relaxation, adiabatic and differential scanning calorimetries. Obtained temperature dependences of the heat capacity are consistent based on adiabatic calorimetry data. Thermodynamic functions (entropy, enthalpy change, reduced Gibbs energy) in the range 0–1865 K are calculated from fitted values. Thermal expansion in the range of 300-1200 K was studied by high-temperature X-ray diffraction and the coefficient of thermal expansion of LaMgAl11O19 was calculated.

Негізгі сөздер

hexaaluminate, magnetoplumbite, heat capacity, thermodynamics, thermal expansion

Толық мәтін

Әдебиет тізімі

Lu H., Wang C.-A., Zhang C. // Ceram. Int. 2014. V. 40. P. 16273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.064
Iyi N., Takekawa S., Kimura S. // J. Solid State Chem. 1989. V. 83. P. 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(89)90048-0
Gadow R., Lischka M. // Surf. Coat. Technol. 2002. V. 151–152. P. 392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01642-5
Bansal N.P., Zhu D. // Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008. V. 202. P. 2698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.09.048
Zhang Y., Wang Y., Jarligo M.O. et al. // Opt. Lasers Eng. 2008. V. 46. P. 601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.04.001
Friedrich C., Gadow R., T. Schirmer T. // J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2001. V. 10. P. 592. https://doi.org/10.1361/105996301770349105
Liu Z.-G., Ouyang J.-H., Zhou Y. // J. Alloys Compd. 2009. V. 472. P. 319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.04.042
Liu Z.-G., Ouyang J.-H., Zhou Y. et al. // Philos. Mag. 2009. V. 89. P. 553. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430802684126
Lee K.N. 4.4.2. Protective coatings for gas turbine // https://www.netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/gas-turbine-handbook/4-4-2.pdf
Wang Y.-H., Ouyang J.-H., Liu Zh.-G. // J. Alloys Compd. 2009. V. 485. P. 734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.06.068
Chen X., Gu L., Zou B. et al. // Surf. Coat. Technol. 2012. V. 206. P. 2265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.09.076.
Cao X.Q., Zhang Y.F., Zhang J.F. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008. V. 28. P. 1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.01.023
Chen X., Zhao Y., Fan X. et al. // Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011. V. 205. P. 3293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.11.059
Doležal V., Nádherný L., Rubešová K. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2019. V. 45. P. 11233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.162
Lefebvre D., Thery J., Vivien D. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1986. V. 69(11). P. C-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1986.tb07380.x
Kahn A., Lejus A.M., Madsac M. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 1981. V. 52. P. 6864. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328680
Lu X., Yuan J., Xu M. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2021. V. 47. P. 28892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.050
Гагарин П.Г., Гуськов А.В., Гуськов В.Н. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2023. Т. 68(11). С. 1607. Gagarin P.G., Guskov A.V., Guskov V.N. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2023. V. 68(11). P. 1599. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023623602064
Lu H., Wang C., Zhang C., Tong S. // J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 2015. V. 35. P. 1297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.10.030
Friedrich C., Gadow R., Schirmer T. // Proc. of the 1st Int. Therm. Spray Conf. 2000. P. 1219. https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2000p1219
Guskov V.N., Tyurin A.V., Guskov A.V. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2020. V. 46. P. 12822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.02.052
Тюрин А.В., Хорошилов А.В., Гуськов В.Н. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2018. Т. 63(12). С. 1583. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0044457X18120218
Voskov A.L., Kutsenok I.B., Voronin G.F. // Calphad. 2018. V. 16. P. 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2018.02.001
Voronin G.F., Kutsenok I.B. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2013. V. 58. P. 2083. https://doi.org/10.1021/je400316m
Prohaska T., Irrgeher J., Benefield J. et al. // Pure Appl. Chem. 2022. V. 94(5). P. 573. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2019-0603
Maier C.G., Kelley K.K. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1932. V. 54. P. 3243. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01347a029

Қосымша файлдар

Әрекет

1. JATS XML

Жүктеу

2. Supplement

Жүктеу (2MB)

Метадеректер

3. Fig. 1. Diffractogram of the LaMgAl11O19 sample.

Жүктеу (204KB)

Метадеректер

4. Fig. 2. Morphology of the LaMgAl11O19 surface after annealing at 1973 K.

Жүктеу (301KB)

Метадеректер

5. Fig. 3. Consistent dependences of the LaMgAl11O19 heat capacity determined by relaxation (O), adiabatic (o) and differential scanning calorimetry (O) methods.